Rife with errors (Score 1)

It seems that SCO has missed a few facts on their stampede to litigation: Except for SCO, none of the primary UNIX vendors ever developed a UNIX "flavor" to operate on an Intel-based processor chip set. Guess they never heard of Solaris x86? What else are the mistaken about along the way? A lot it seems... perhaps we should take score? 1 pt for each marketing hype disguised as legal verbiage. 2 pts for each plain old mistake 3 pts for each sneaky misdirection (i.e. that Linux could not run on more than 4 CPU's without massive help from a big vendor) Anybody want to total up this mess? At least we all get to see how afraid of Linux the actual UNIX holder is. Interesting stuff.