Re:Bad summary and random story! (Score 1)

IAWTC.

If you read the text of the exchange liz_marcs had with LJ Abuse, you'll see this:

The LiveJournal Abuse Prevention team only investigates material which has been reported to us. Should a link be reported in a case where it is clear from the context that any violation of the Terms of Service is entirely unintentional and caused by a change in the page content after the time the link was made, the action LiveJournal would take would be to ask the user to remove the link; it would not count as a "strike" under the "two strike" rule.

Am I the only one who finds this to be TOTALLY reasonable? The summary, and many of the comments here, seem to be all up in arms about how if a page changes, someone is going to have their LiveJournal deleted... when the words quoted above make it pretty clear that unless a user mentions the illegal content in the context of the link, they're just going to let you know that the content changed, and ask you to remove the link!