I am happy to not need to spend countless hours each year chasing infections out of my computers. My attitude would be like yours if I had to suffer as I did when using Windiz, worse if I still did it for a living as you do.
Your users should not have to know of or bother with malware solutions. The same lazy ignorant customers could use Unix or GNU with human nature & without exposing gaping holes to evil intentions. Users not paying protection money to partially close holes designed into all Windiz products is not the reason for malware success. Poor design & bad intentions in Redmond is the cause.
After 3 new designs, Windiz in still bait for trouble, meanwhile Unix & GNU just get better, even with Apple topping.
Open office does all I need on any OS I use and does not corrupt the registry like M$off. If start time of OO was an issue, I'd allow quick start to run.
Yes, OO has wrecked some formatting of documents that had had repeated conversions to RTF, doc, html & odt formats. Same as in M$off, quick cure is saving as a text file then formatting in your favorite format. I do not prefer M$ format that supports malwares.
My Thinkpad T60, 2 GHz 32 bit system boots XP in 80 seconds, uses 390 MB RAM plus 725 MB virtual memory just to run a stripped, minimal version of XP with no user programs running, not even email. Compare that to full Linux in 42 seconds using 170 MB without swap memory.
My AMD & Nvidia, 2.4 GHz 64 bit system boots 64 bit xp in 50 seconds to desktop then continues to flog HDD for 10 to 20 more seconds and needs over 610 MB to run plus any programs I don't run on it. But that is just a curiosity as I have no need or desire to use any M$ programs. Picasa, OO, Firefox, Esword, Thunderbird, card games, all are available in Windiz & GNU versions, so why use Windiz? Maybe just to support the botnet?
Same 64 bit computer loads Linux full versions, in 40 seconds with no swap memory used. Been watching my systems use 299 to 515MB with Linux and full desktop, Firefox, Thunderbird,laser & inkjet printers, OOWord, OOCalc, about 6 windows open. That with usually no swap memory. One time, after 300 MB of software install, one had 214 MB swap (virtual to you) memory in use.
Curious how you find a current Linux that does not auto install all the hardware drivers you need for your hardware. My 4 computers all require getting drivers from maker, Redmond does not supply all drivers needed.
Lacking any pre 2007 computer, Lacking any bottom end hardware like celeron, sempron or dell, I have no way to begin to test your claims of lacking drivers. I do use Knoppix or other Live Linux CDs to test Windiz computers. Live Linux always finds all the hardware in good order, so Windiz is the problem in every failure I isolate. Regardless, your claim that Linux only fully installs on hardware no longer supported by your chosen OS seems a poor arguement.
Full screen flash for me is on Linux & 1920 X 1200 screen. And it does look bad as any compressed 400 X 300 video stretched to full HD size.
After you wasted 25 minutes & >$100 installing Windiz 6.0, how much more time & $ for new M$off & new anti malware programs also? My less than 25 minute Linux installs include all the office software except Thunderbird.
If you will try a current version of GNU, I suggest
http://www2.mandriva.com/ for a download of Mandriva One in no arch version. That version has software for proprietary formats and does not require separate versions for or knowledge of 64 & 32 bit systems.