Comment Never "lost" (Score 2, Informative) 316
As with most "journalism", this should be taken with a shaker of salt. There's a lot of promotional and journalistic bombast.
Tolkien's translation of _Beowulf_ has never been "lost". It was deposited in the Bodleian archives by Christopher Tolkien himself, and has been listed in the Tolkien MS catalogue ever since. I myself saw it during the Tolkien Centenary Conference in 1992, as I am sure have many other readers before and since that time.
The same, by the way, is true of the two versions of the essay, "Beowulf and the Critics", which Michael Drout has recently published. In fact, no manuscript deposited with the Bodleian archives can, without great hyperbole, be described as "lost".
I'll also note that the figure of "2000" manuscript pages is either a typo or the result of great confusion; it is too high by about a factor of 10.
Tolkien's translation of _Beowulf_ has never been "lost". It was deposited in the Bodleian archives by Christopher Tolkien himself, and has been listed in the Tolkien MS catalogue ever since. I myself saw it during the Tolkien Centenary Conference in 1992, as I am sure have many other readers before and since that time.
The same, by the way, is true of the two versions of the essay, "Beowulf and the Critics", which Michael Drout has recently published. In fact, no manuscript deposited with the Bodleian archives can, without great hyperbole, be described as "lost".
I'll also note that the figure of "2000" manuscript pages is either a typo or the result of great confusion; it is too high by about a factor of 10.
