Could be worse (Score 1)

While I agree that this isn't likely to have much effect - I expect the list will be almost empty if they are careful, and full of 'regular' porn sites if not - it's not as bad as I was afraid when I first read the headline. They could have just said that ISP's were required to block child porn, and let the ISP's do the choosing. This way, everyone is working from the same list, so if the list gets munged up it only has to be fixed once.