See subject

Time to take action, Mr. Obama!

You cannot predict what happens in face of a real treat from the - lucky - turnout of just one single case. That is statistically meaningless. The next time the same process may as well fail at one point...

How can one be considered scientifically literate if he still believes in creatism!?

The big red eye is closing. May be Jupiter is tired watching us destroying Earth...?

Every owner of a car should have the possibility to pay for a "crash avoidance insurance". That is, the more he pays, the higher the chance to be avoided by a crash from an autonomous car. The program then only has to compare 2 numbers (the amount of money each car owner spent) - et voila - hit that poor drivers cheap Suzuki and avoid the rich mans costly BMW...

What do you expect to be the *most common* passwords used? Something like "nx4897)(/)hahaha98@79"? Would be more interesting to know *how often* simple passwords are used. If the highest percentage of a single weak password in use was about 0.0001%, everything should be fine. But if >=10% of all passwords used were a weak, that would be bad...

Scientists should stop discovering resources. Every newly discovered resource reduces the pressure to apply more reason to the usage of existing/known resources...

When providing a picture or an 3D object as a captcha - in which LANGUAGE do you expect the users to answer?
Do you really believe that the whole world has to be fluent English (or whatever your native language might be) speakers to solve them? What about the whole rest of the world?
What about people who know what they see, but cant type in its name correctly? Is it a bunnie? A bonny? A buny? Or a bunny? Or is it a hare? A hair? Captcha solving is not meant to be an orthography test after all...
Think again and youll see - epic fail!