Me: Can blockchains transform LLMs?
ChatGPT: Yes, blockchains have the potential to transform large language models (LLMs) in several significant ways. While they aren't directly linked in a technological sense, combining the two can offer benefits that improve LLMs' capabilities, accessibility, and trustworthiness. Here are a few areas where blockchains could impact LLMs:[...]

Yeah, right.

I agree. My algorithm of choice would be very simple: just show me the posts by whomever I decided to follow. Don't suggest stuff. Don't push anything to my wall/stream/whatever you want to call it unless **I** have chosen to receive content from that source.
I'm sure the implementation would be technically trivial :-)

Nice unique identifier... add "unambiguous", and you'll start thinking the system is perfect. Except the ISBN doesn't strictly deserve any one of these adjectives.

1) Not all books have an ISBN (the best you could say is that most modern books indeed have one)
2) Some books have more than one ISBN
3) Some ISBNs have been re-used for a different book after the first one went out of print

Yeah, replacing glass with plastic has definitely changed that for the better.

Have you heard about Zotero http://www.zotero.org and Mendeley https://www.mendeley.com/ ? They're both much better than Endnote IMHO.

Silly producers, they had to purchase IP rights from the game owners... we could increase our margin by using a public-domain game and make a FORTUNE!
Some suggestions for forthcoming movies:
- checkers
- tic-tac-toe
- go

> Billions have been wasted rewriting the same code (at times in roundabout ways) just to avoid copyLEFT restrictions!

Billions have been wasted rewriting the same code (at times in roundabout ways) just to avoid proprietary restrictions, too. People who want to use copyleft code only have to release their changes, it's not such a big deal...
From the point of view of the software ecosystem, I'd say that the GNU toolchain has given birth to what I consider the most successful open-source project ever, namely Linux (probably a billion-dollar success overall), mostly under the GPL. From an industrial point of view, copyleft hasn't harmed Google too much, and Apple is definitely not a model for free software.

> I think that free and transparent will prevail, that is Google Scholar.

I agree about the free part, but "transparent"? Not really. How do you know what's in GS or not? How do you correct inaccurate data when you notice it? There are so many questions about the under-the-hood working of GS that I'd like to ask...

Because the most offending importer belongs to the same parent company as the main French publishing company.

> Tolkien actually enjoyed hard sf, especially Asimov

Huh? Could you please tell us your evidence for this? I was under the impression (based on JRRT's letters and novels) that he wasn't too keen on technology and the so-called modern world. So I have some difficulty imagining him interested in a distant future filled with spaceships and robots.

> Publishing articles nowadays is terribly easy and does not cost a thing (arxiv)

Note that this is no longer accurate: Arxiv is now asking universities worldwide for donations. It isn't a mandatory license fee and it only amounts to a handful of commercial journal subscriptions, but it is no longer "not a thing".

> Some UN fixes I can think of are 1) t 1) the invasion of Normandy in 1942 and the subsequent war in Europe against Germany

Sorry, but huh?
- the invasion of Normandy took place in 1944. There was a raid on the city of Dieppe in 1942, performed by Canadian forces under British command, but it was a complete failure.
- the United Nations didn't really exist until 1945, at which time they mostly meant "the WW2 winners"

What does it have to do with the UN?

In case it wasn't sarcasm but genuine surprise, yes, there are such beasts: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_science

Doen't string theory (supposed to be predicting the behavior of spacetime at very high energies as far as could understand from popular science books) claim that there are more dimensions than the 4 we observe, rather than less? I'm confused...

Smartphones are only one generation away from achieving console-like performance. Counting in IT generations that's what, 2 years? Sony should be worried.