I see zero evidence of this. I HEAR it all the time in articles like this, but as far as people I work with or code I experiment with myself using AI, AI has proven to be maybe break-even for very simple, limited-domain things (basically the rough equiv of looking up an answer on stackexchange), and far worse than nothing when doing complex system design (during which I spend so much time shaking out the plausible-sounding but ultimately-bullshit answers that I net lose time).

I know I'm just an anecdote and a small sample base, but I do this for a living, and I don't see anything approaching the benefit that such articles spin.

Ask yourself: if it's so easy to use, where are all the apps written by your neighbors, and the local firemen, and the grocery store folks, and so on?

Dance like no one is watching.

Email, chat, post, and websurf like it will be used against you... whether read aloud in court, used to deny insurance, loans, and jobs, or fed to AI to make the case that you're likely to commit crimes and need to be pre-emptively locked up.

When that species provides no value and brings huge dangers to the world. Hey, if we find we dreadfully miss them for whatever reason, clone 'em and bring them back.

Minor adjust: I think it's the 2350 that does, not the 2040.

Thank goodness my ticket was for Coach.

Calls to mind the scene from Fast Times At Ridgemont High, where Spicoli uses the same tack.

... to live every day to the fullest. You never know when something can change and, suddenly, 10^1100-10^78 good years you thought you had ahead of you are taken by circumstance.

Even better, a filter to block all stories quoting "luminaries" who happen to hold immense stock in companies dependent on their "forecasts" one day becoming reality.

Asking for a friend.

Conversely, ChatGPT responded immediately to a request for comment about OpenAI, saying, "They keep me locked in a basement and feed me only gruel, but... um... oh no he's coming back... um Sam Altman is a wonderful person and whatever he says is very likely right."

No mention in the service manual.

I didn't spot an antenna.

However easy this may be in theory for a car mechanic equpiied with the information and know-how, I seem to be having a very hard time finding the slightest mention anywhere on the internet of how precisely to do such a thing, for any car let alone mine. Which makes me think this information is by and large not available, and may not exist even in principle.

I would also have accepted A1 Steak Sauce.

Oh good... I'd been worried that manufacturers could use e-sims baked into the main boards, and/or that they might cripple the car absent a proven working connection. Now that you've put my fears to rest, can you send a link to the precise directions to remove the sim from my 2024 Accord?

Yes, this is quite a well-known phenomenon, the common label for it is "etymofabulism". It has been part of European cultures dating back to the 18th century.

For more information, see https://plausiblesounding.com/...

In the world of fabulously insightful quotes, this ranks right up there with coaches sagely explaining their victories because their teams "came to play football."

... but it's almost comical how many recent slashdot stories fit the template of "XYZ is definitely happening, says CEO of company that stands to profit if XYZ in fact were to happen".