Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Performance per watt (Score 1) 193

Intel's 14nm process is in most ways better than Samsung's 10nm (Qualcomm's fab for this chip). IMHO this isn't really going to be won on feature size of the process between the two.

The advantages Cavium and Qualcomm have are cheaper chips (also more integrated, SAS, PCI lanes) with higher core counts and more memory channels than Intel. In some applications the higher memory channels count and bandwith will be very valuable (HPC). Intel will be able to discount the heck out of their high core count Xeons to match on price and they can lower the clock to match on IPS for each core. They can't add a memory channel where it doesn't exist.

While I agree that the vertical integration of Intel's past may not be the best way for the future, they still have the best process engineers in the world. They still have the best process for the foreseeable future. They also have some of the best semiconductor engineers out there. So while there is a fight coming. Intel is hardly "fucked" or headed for decimation.

Slashdot Top Deals

The unfacts, did we have them, are too imprecisely few to warrant our certitude.