Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f (Score 1) 666

No it's not. Even the most die-hard capital 'L' Libertarian would agree that the enforcement of property and human rights are a legitimate function of the state. That would include preventing assholes with AK-47s from holding property and human beings hostage until a nice fat ransom is paid.

The only reason L-libertarians support the government in fighting physical tyranny is because it is the only weapon that the "peasants" have to fight their desired L-libertarian economic tyranny. Make no mistake, these faux-libertarians are really just authoritarians in disguise.

As a l-libertarian, these people piss me off because they have turned the word libertarian into little more than a pejorative now...

Comment Re:Weather they stop the ads? (Score 3, Insightful) 98

In the mean time there's a greater likelihood I'll chance across something that is actually valuable to me

In all honesty, I don't think I have ever seen an ad that was of value to me. Maybe I'm just weird or something, but I start with a need and then seek out a solution in a product or service to fulfill it, usually through reviews and such. I never see an ad and then suddenly decide I need the product or service.

Never mind. I forgot about porn.

Comment Re:On Society, and Sociopathy (Score 1) 280

Social mammals tend to emulate the alpha individuals of their groups. The alphas, by dint of successfully establishing themselves as alphas, are viewed as successful -- When sociopaths lead our companies, the employees themselves will, generally speaking, start behaving more sociopathically. It's basic survival.

By coincidence, I was just looking at this:

People literally ARE becoming more and more narcissistic and I believe you are probably right in ascribing it to poor societal role models...

Comment Re:...For now. (Score 5, Insightful) 324

watch a company out-Microsoft Microsoft

Which is why I don't use Google or any of their products and hopefully never will. Google is setting itself up to be as big or an even bigger threat than Microsoft has been to our freedom.

They are trying to monopolize internet communication itself. They are trying to control both the content and the interface by which you access it. They have their hands in e-books, internet videos, cellphones, operating systems, search, advertising, e-mail, applications, browsers, computer hardware and much more. They may not succeed, but there is no doubt they are trying.

They may be beneficent now, but most corporations have an authoritarian hierarchy and all it will take is a change of leadership for things to change and I, for one, don't want anyone having that much power in their eventually corrupted hands.

It may seem wise to some that the enemy (Google) of their enemy (Microsoft) is their friend, but history has shown that most revolutions wind up just instituting a different authoritarian regime of their own, despite their best intentions. I hope I'm wrong, but I would very wary of what Google has the potential to become in the future.

Comment Re:Is this really about copyright? (Score 5, Insightful) 247

Is this really about copyright?

Absolutely. The way the world works is, when you are the underdog you "steal" the IP of all the countries around you until you achieve some level of economic parity, and then you hypocritically pull the ladder up behind you to try and prevent anyone else from doing the same.

America did it. South Korea did it. Now, China is doing it. It's about preserving economic hegemony, nothing more.

Comment Re:Idiocracy is classist bullshit (Score 3, Interesting) 411

Idiocracy is classist bullshit that comforts rich wankers who desperately want to believe that they're rich because of some inherent superiority

The part that I find most humorous about this fact is that our DNA doesn't care what we do for a living or how big our houses are. It doesn't care how intelligent we are either. The goal of our DNA is procreation. So if the rich have fewer children than the poor, then the rich are, by definition, genetically inferior to the poor, and it is natural selection that makes them a minority.

Funnier yet, it is the rich who can afford to have the most children, so the poor are beating them despite having a severe handicap.

Comment Re:Doing the math (Score 1) 294

Assuming eight notes

Technically only 7 notes, as the 8th note is the first note an octave higher.

The other thing the person you replied to neglected to take into account in addition to what you have already mentioned is that over several thousand years, music theory has worked out pretty well what sounds good and what doesn't. As such, the computer wouldn't have to crunch all combinations. It would simply focus on melodies based on only a couple of scales played over the few basic chord progressions that make up most popular music.

Comment Re:It's yhy anti-piracy is a BAD thing... (Score 1) 294

I'm not sure piracy is a good thing: the costs to society, especially in terms of legal enforcement, are immense. I hope it becomes irrelevant over time

If I were Bill Gates rich, I would make it irrelevant myself.

I would create two monstrous supercomputers. The first would create musical melodies based on the number of notes required by copyright statutes to qualify as unique; the idea being to try and copyright all possibilities of note/time combinations for that level of uniqueness through brute force computing over time.

The second supercomputer would analyze as much new music on the market as possible using the data from the first to determine infringement and automatically send out subpoenas to cease and desist.

The eventual goal would be to crash the copyright system by eventually making it difficult and eventually impossible for anyone to create non-infringing music.

With copyright no longer tenable, piracy would no longer exist and music, a performance art, would go back to being just that; a PERFORMANCE art.

Comment Re:So what then ? (Score 1) 284

The answer is to do nothing at all. They serve the market, not the other way around. If the market no longer thinks the product they sell is worth paying for, then they have to develop a new product that the market DOES find valuable or they die.

Their attempts to coerce the market to support their incompetence and unwillingness to adapt is despicable.

Comment No killing to be seen here (Score 1, Insightful) 543

These are animated polygons. There are no soldiers, there are no civilians, there is no killing, no one has been harmed. If you think otherwise, you need psychiatric help. It isn't real. I don't care if you get to decapitate children and make soup bowls out of their skulls with which to drink the blood of vivisected virgins. It doesn't matter. I repeat, it isn't real. Until we create an AI that becomes self-aware, these polygonal representations have no rights and our treatment of them is irrelevant.

Slap a rating on it and treat it like you would any other piece of media.

I'm always amazed at how evil and brutal human beings are to each other and yet we sit around and get outraged over things that aren't real, while generally sitting on our collective asses when it comes to doing the same in the real world. People need to just STFU when it comes to fiction. Get upset about real life and do something about it.

Comment Re:NO!NO!NO! (Score 0) 155

Your butchering of that Franklin quote does nothing to help your point

Considering my only statement WAS the quote, what point exactly are you implying that the quote doesn't help? You clearly have no idea what point I was actually making at all.

Who are you, or anyone else, to tell a consumer that what they value is foolish? Obviously the parent values things in a different way than you.

Who are you to tell me that what I value is foolish? Obviously I value different things than you do. Ever heard of hypocrisy?

as if giving gamers the option of downloading takes away their property rights or something.

Nowhere did I say I was against downloading. In fact, I am vehemently against the physical production of goods that can be created and distributed digitally. I will NOT buy movies, games, software or music on physical discs and wish for the complete death of manufacturers that produce such environmentally destructive and unnecessary junk.

Comment Markets determine value, NOT producers (Score 1) 762

If the market is unwilling to financially support a work and would rather pirate it instead, then said work is not a viable product and has no real value. NO ONE has any inherent right to make money doing whatever they want, no matter how much effort they put into it.

If you can't make a living making something as trivial as games, get a new career or find some rich eccentric to bankroll your so-called “art”.

Where developers/artists get such a sense of entitlement from is beyond me. The only thing piracy stats prove is how completely out of touch they are with the market; a market that is currently in a huge recession with massive unemployment, I might add...

Slashdot Top Deals

In less than a century, computers will be making substantial progress on ... the overriding problem of war and peace. -- James Slagle