Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Gee, what a surprise (Score 1) 273

While the nominal tax rates were higher during that period (1930s through '70s), the tax code was full of all sorts of loop holes that got closed during the 1980's (as part of the deal to lower the nominal tax rates). The actual tax rates paid by the wealthy hasn't really changed much. Here is an interesting article explaining this. https://mises.org/library/good...

Comment Re:That stuff is newbie trap though (Score 1) 72

RAM speed does make a difference in some games; Arma 3 will run about 20% faster using DDR4 3000 RAM versus DDR4 2133. Fallout 4 is also rather sensitive to memory speeds as well. Still, going beyond 3200 mhz RAM seems to have some seriously diminishing returns, and isn't worth it.

Comment Re:and, while cache hit rate is 98% for everyone (Score 1) 72

Some games really do benefit from having faster memory. Arma 3 for example, really benefits from higher memory speed; in The Techreport's test, for example, moving from DDR4 2133 RAM to DDR4 3866 RAM increases the fps from 46 to 56. http://techreport.com/review/3... Of course, the DDR4 3000 kit they tested got 54 fps; that is probably about where diminishing returns kick in for most games. Fallout 4 is another game where having faster memory can make a 10-15% difference in certain areas.

Comment Re:Dear AMD..... (Score 3, Insightful) 67

That is exactly what AMD is doing with Ryzen; top models will have 8 cores, each with a integer & FPU. A French PC magazine benchmarked a low-clocked engineering sample (3.15ghz base, 3.4 ghz boost) and found for productivity work it was faster than an Intel 6800k. The one AMD was showing off at CES is clocked at 3.6 ghz, with 3.9ghz boost.

Comment Re:A problem that is worth having (Score 5, Interesting) 295

It will probably be a long time before truck drivers are completely replaced - take a look at railroads, for example. It would be technically possible to automate railroads right now, but the rail companies haven't done so; having a person onboard is very useful for legal liability, security, and fixing all the minor, odd issues that come up, and so on. I guess that we will probably end up with "freight stewards" in trucks, where the computer does most of the driving, but the steward takes over for odd cases, and gets out and fixes minor issues to keep the truck on the road, provide physical security to the freight, and help with loading/unloading at the end points.

Comment Re:So overpopulation is not an issue? (Score 5, Informative) 120

Africa is where most of the population growth is coming from, so that is where it makes sense to focus efforts on awareness of birth control, and get people to chose quality of children over quantity of children. China, for example, doesn't need any additional birth control programs since their birth rate is already below replacement level. The UN estimates China's population will decline from its current 1.4 billion to 1 billion by 2100. The UN also estimates India will grow from 1.3 billion now to 1.6 billion by 2100. By contrast, Africa is estimated to grow from its current 1 billion people to over 4 billion by 2100.

Comment Sad that it is hard to breed cheetahs in captivity (Score 1) 120

It is sad that it is apparently difficult to breed cheetahs in captivity - they need large open spaces to run and do their courtship rituals. Which is particularity bad, because they actually are one of the easier wild animals to tame, and would be fairly easy to turn into pets (and thus in no danger of extinction) if that breeding issue where solved. I know I would love a pet cheetah.

Comment Re:So overpopulation is not an issue? (Score 2) 120

Start sending lots of birth control devices (condoms, IUDs, birth control shots, ect) to Africa (where most of the world's population growth is going on), and start some education/propaganda efforts to convince them that having one or two kids per woman will result in a higher quality life for them. As it stands now, most estimates are that Africa will have 4 billion people by 2100, versus the 1 billion they have now. I don't see much of the African megafauna serving that much of a population boom.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any program which runs right is obsolete.

Working...