Wrong, free speech has to have it inherently built in to allow for anonymous free speech. To go elsewhere is just as the article states (And I am NO fan of Micro$oft propaganda articles or studies) but in this case I think she is correct in that it is an authoritarian assertion of power over vulnerable people

Two quick examples of U.S. law the link anonymous speech directly to the Constitution Right to Free Speech that I found are "Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (1960), the Court struck down a Los Angeles city ordinance that made it a crime to distribute anonymous pamphlets. In McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995), the Court struck down an Ohio statute that made it a crime to distribute anonymous campaign literature."

If you half an open mind, you might also want to check out the EFF site and try to look at it from another point of view. https://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity

Anonymity/pseudonimity is not purely for Trolls and F**wads.

Don't trust the M$ any farther than you can throw them.

In other words "Its a trap!" - AA

As we slide quickly down into the abyss of tyranny, may we all scream with delight as we are "protected" from our own rights of privacy.

Interesting, yet a flaimingly tart response.

So how do you explain this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delicious_(website)
Delicious (formerly del.icio.us, pronounced "delicious") is a social bookmarking web service for storing, sharing, and discovering web bookmarks

Or this.

http://www.delicious.com/help/learn
"...Delicious is a Social Bookmarking service..."

I have a bridge to sell ya!

Famous qoute, "First Kill all the lawyers" seems apropos.

And I know it probably wasn't what was intended within the context of the play, but it sure does seem correct now.

great test

Network Error (tcp_error)

A communication error occurred: ""
The Web Server may be down, too busy, or experiencing other problems preventing it from responding to
requests. You may wish to try again at a later time.

For assistance, contact your network support team.

You are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute

ahh, but to get paid for stating the obvious, that is the perfect destination of a researchers quest.

http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2010/08/15/
http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2010/05/20/

Or, if we could set the gravity keel to provide that sideways force diversion in relation to the solar flux.

Oh yea, wrong century... resetting my temporal resonator to a more reasonable timeline.

doWhatISayNotAsIDo()

When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, 'This you may not read, this you may not see, this you are forbidden to know,' the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything--you can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. [Robert Heinlein]