Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Privacy

Matt Blaze Examines Communications Privacy 44

altjira writes "Matt Blaze analyzes the implications of a recent Newsweek story on the Bush administration's use of the NSA for domestic spying on communications, and questions whether the lower legal threshold for the collection of communications metadata is giving away too much to the government: 'As electronic communication pervades more of our daily lives, transaction records — metadata — can reveal quite a bit about us, indeed often much more than a few out-of-context conversations might. Aggregated into databases with other people's records (or perhaps everyone's records) and analyzed by powerful software, metadata by itself can paint a remarkably detailed picture of connections, relationships, and other patterns that could never be recovered simply from listening to the conversations themselves.'"

Comment Re:Habeus Corpus (Score 1) 274

At this time, the United States is *not* in a state of war. If we were, we would be expected to abide by little inconveniences like the Geneva Conventions. This is the logic that Our Fearless Leaders have used to excuse their inexcusable behavior. Therefore, either we are at war and have been violating a considerable number of international laws, or we are not at war and we are expected to follow our own domestic laws, such as the phrasing of the Fifth Amendment that someone else has already mentioned -- which specifically states that it applies to any PERSON, not just to any citizen.

Which is better -- to be seen as criminals in the eyes of the rest of the world, or to be seen as hypocrites both at home and abroad?

Slashdot Top Deals

Mathematics is the only science where one never knows what one is talking about nor whether what is said is true. -- Russell

Working...