https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Basically, the gist is that the owner of the Echelon bike had a perfectly working product, at which point the manufacturer *broke* it by forcing defective firmware onto the device, and the owner thereby needs a legal means of recourse to "fix" it by removing the defective firmware.
https://alexwasburne.substack.com/p/the-short-case-for-a-lab-origin
https://alexwasburne.substack.com/p/the-case-for-a-lab-origin-of-sars
Does anyone have any rebuttal or counterpoint to the information he presents here? It seems quite persuasive. The technical details of the gene insertion markers. The early shutdown of the lab, as shown by cell phone location data. The defective HEPA filters.
But there's a thing that can kill enjoyment of a game with the absolute best graphics, and that's crappy gameplay. Poor storytelling, bad controls, annoying mechanics. And Nintendo really understands this and puts lots of effort into the gameplay, which is why the churn out amazing games, even if they don't have the best graphics in the industry.
The goal of Computer Science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it.