That's not "how can I avoid bugs", which the halting problem appears to fundamentally prove is impossible in the general case (most programs can not be have their behaviour proven one way or the other). "How can I avoid this bug" or more valuably "How can I avoid this class of bug" is exactly the sort of that leads sensibly to the answer "write in (safe) rust", for several classes of common bug. Answers like "be more careful", "check your work now thoroughly", "have others check your work" and "apply tools to C code" are known to be the c wrong answers for sure. So far you've just said people should think about it. I don't think there's a moderately experienced programmer spice who hasn't thought about it. You seen to suggest that they're are easy answers, when the evidence is that there are no answers at all. If you've nothing concrete to suggest, I'm going to find you're a troll and stop feeding you at this point

No programmer has ever found an answer to that question, other than to stop writing code! If you've some new magically solution for avoiding bugs, there's infinite money you can trivially make

What about every other kernel developer? None of them have successfully answered the question "How do I avoid bugs?" except the people who stopped developing code. The idea that anybody can magically avoid writing bugs is utter nonsense. Nobody has managed it. The most reviewed and security reviewed code in the world (e.g. curl) still has bugs found, including security bugs, frequently, even in older code. You're clueless.

They're mirrored around the world, so done...

If either of those fairy stories was true, there'd be a transparent investigation, potentially a trial. The many publically available videos, and the analysis of the same by well recognised experts, strongly disagrees with your claims. Statements from the executive branch on the subject were full of trivially provable lies.

The USA has put the executive in charge of everything, with far worse results. Constitutions aren't worth jack if nobody enforces them, and the USA has the government executing citizens in the street with impunity.

I also hope that he draws lessons from Douglas Adams, who was very good at realising that telling a story in a book, on radio, on TV or in a movie are fundamentally and each takes work and skill to do well. Many things that work well in a book can't be translated well to screen, or vise versa

How about looking at what the macbook pro market might actually want from a laptop? My list would include: More radio connectivity - built in IoT networks, sub-1ghz wifi, 5g Better mics with more background noise filtering / directivity (though my M4 is already pretty good) Better thermal management (always) That's pretty much it for me

Don't cut them off form the internet, cut them off from the DMCA for say a year after every false claim, including claims that are clearly fair use.

Thanks, I'll stop wondering :-)

How do salvage laws apply to unmanned vessels? Are these small enough to legally count as bouys? (That what micro-transat etc count as, I believe)

The right to repair it doesn't help in the medium or long term if they're removing the training to do so, or the supply of spare parts, I think McFlurry machines are rather lower risks and lower tolerances than heart & lung machines

"actual extremist and left socialism fuck"? Are you aware of what those words mean? I can't see anything except pure capitalist greed *on either side* of this dispute

There's nothing in any opensource license I know of about being "fair". You either meet the license obligations, or you don't.

For the partially sighted, 'fake' engine noise on an EV can literally be a lifesaver, and some version of it is mandatory in many countries for this reason. If you've got to fake a noise anyway, might as well be a good one