This treaty has been in force since 2002. Lots of flights have occurred over Russia and over a lot of other people, including the United States. They happen pretty often, actually.

But good for Finland!

The protest has been filed (it just costs a stamp!) and the stop work either has or will soon be official direction from the contracting officer.

SpaceX and Boeing may use their own funding to work on whatever they like, but they CANNOT charge the Government for the work they perform during the stop work. If the protest is not sustained and the contracts are left in place, the net effect would then be that they would complete their contracts for less than the negotiated cost. I don't know what sort of contract they have with NASA, but for a fixed-price contract it will come out in the wash and they'll be reimbursed for the work they did on their own dime during the protest (in effect, but not strictly legally).

If the contract is instead cost-plus (incentive or fee), they will come in under their bid and be: 1) unable to recover their investment, because it's illegal to bill the work after the fact if you weren't authorized to do the work, and 2) in hot water with NASA, because it's illegal for the Government to accept the work for free.

In short, reputable contractors do NOT perform work on Government contracts when told to stop. It's bad all around.

It's not a bad theory, but the leading candidate relates to impact processes that leave what is called "remanent magnetization". The science is not settled. The abstract here gives you a feel for the kind of discussions taking place (but you probably have to pay to get to the article). Google will turn up more work along these lines, including tests in hypervelocity launcher facilities.

It's clear that our failure to respond to the extraterrestrials shorter burst of gamma rays have led them to try to get our attention with much bigger and more powerful technology.

Will someone please answer that phone?!

... and buy insurance. Contract for immediate armed response to the alarm if you really want somebody to get hurt.

So, at a time when orbital debris is very much a major problem for a sizable number of space-faring nations, the US forced China to create in LEO the largest and longest-lived debris field since the dawn of the space age, posing a hazard to everybody trying to operate there.

And they are complete and helpless victims of "open spying by satellites", with no spy satellites of their own.

When China finally reaches the modern era and actually lets its people have free access to information, such ignorant posts as yours might become less common. Well, no, this is Slashdot.

They were in talks to participate in the ISS. The ISS partners invited them in as potential responsible, collaborative partners in the future of manned space flight..

Then they conducted a reckless ASAT test at relatively high LEO altitudes and nearly doubled the number of trackable debris at that altitude [see Johnson Space Center's Orbital Debris Quarterly Newsletter for the chart]. At that altitude, the pieces of their defunct weather satellite will remain a hazard for many decades. That got them uninvited.

China needs to decide whether the PLA is running the show or not, and decide whether they want to be a responsible space-faring nation... or not.

An incredibly large number of things. People who don't do research for a living would be shocked to discover how many "facts" are taken on faith and never really subjected to any scrutiny. Then, one day, somebody does and it's a big discovery. The amazing part is how common it is.

What's somewhat related and very interesting is that the space shuttle often flies in the 200-300 km range of altitudes. We consider that "space", but it's right in the heart of the ionosphere in most places.

It's all a matter of perspective.

A thinner or closer ionosphere does not relate to scouring of the atmosphere by the solar wind. It is the Earth's natural magnetic field that protects the atmosphere from being stripped away by the supersonic solar wind.

A pending reversal of the Earth's magnetic dipole may somewhat increase atmospheric scouring, but you must remember that only the dipole moment is going to reverse direction. The higher order (e.g. quadrupole) moments won't go anywhere and will still deflect the solar wind. You'll just get aurora in unusual places for a while.

Right, and later on something will fail and it will explode unexpectedly.

The idea has been tried before (big surprise). The Russians used to deliberately blow up their satellites or rocket bodies, and in doing so produced an enormous amount of debris. They eventually saw that this wasn't the best idea.