Comment Re:My fellow Christians: Strategize (Score 1) 943
Evolution is not "biased". (note: if you disagree, then explain the bias, do not merely assert it)
Yes it is biased. It's a theory that is assumed true with evidence being gathered to support it. Scientists don't want anything but their own arrogance to be proven true. Do you actually think they would try to find any evidence that goes against it?
You are mistaken. Theories are single collective explanations for an observed phenomenon. They are not "two viewpoints". Perhaps you should consider that your problems with evolution are with your own understanding of both it and of science in general and not an actual fault with the theory itself.
Your right they are single collective explanations, but those explanations only go to prove the theory and do not attempt to disprove it. When someone is trying to prove something the sure as heck don't include something that doesn't fit, and the stuff that doesn't fit is molded until it does or simply thrown out as unrelated.
Scientists have one arrogant goal. Prove that mankind is in control and has an answer for everything. I have a brother-in-law who worked for a major scientific research laboratory near Chicago. He told me that the ultimate goal of the company was to prove the big-bang theory. He said that any research that could be used as evidence was accepted and there was no attempt to disprove or test against the evidence. This is not science, this is molding evidence to prove a theory that is already assumed to be true.