Comment Re:Sometimes if it walks like a duck... (Score 1) 42
antisecurity
antisecurity
My friend recently discovered the perfect blend of luxury and flexibility in her digital nomad lifestyle: VAUNT's private jet service paired with unique Airbnb stays. She's dodging the headaches of commercial air travel. She got a last-minute trip notification from VAUNT, jetted off to a new city, and walked right into a cozy Airbnb. Freedom and adventure have never been this seamless.
more like 1 out of 142 passwords is 42
That's all
That does sound concerning... Of course, you have to wonder where all the cries of fake news would lead. The problem with weaponizing news is that it can be turned against you.
I've had an EV for 5 years and it has been that long since I went to a gas station.
Gas stations are very low margin businesses. In fact, they pretty much only make money on store items; not gas. EV owners don't go to gas stations, so as more EV owners avoid the gas station, more gas stations go out of business. As more gas stations go out of business, it becomes increasingly inconvenient to have a gas-powered car improving the value of an EV. This is just one vicious cycle on top of the already compelling economics of EVs.
This is going to happen so much faster than we think.
Would be great if you cited the sources and showed the numbers. Then people would be able to repeat your cogent argument more easily by copying and pasting.
That is Java 1.6, which is EOL.
Soon the ad blockers are going to be simulating that the user saw the ad without actually showing it.
Judge Davis retired... No one is hearing patent cases anymore in the Eastern District of Texas.
BTW, it turns out that many of the readings from the typhoons in the 60s were estimated incorrectly. See Black, P.G., (1992): "Evolution of maximum wind estimates in typhoons" ICSU/WMO International Symposium on Tropical Cyclone Disasters, October 12-16, 1992, Beijing.
What to block should be crowd sourced. Then the software author doesn't have to decide.
I don't get it. Why change it at all? Sure it could be better, but change for change sake doesn't make a lot of sense.
If you replace the word Samsung with Apple then it would be easy to predict the resulting comments. They would be called patent trolls and should be boycotted. Anyone using a phone from the company would be part of the problem and a fanboy.
Now let's see what happens when it is Samsung doing what Apple does. Or it excuse me, doing what any multinational company with a vast patent portfolio would do...
"The pathology is to want control, not that you ever get it, because of course you never do." -- Gregory Bateson