Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Every picture tells a story, donut. (Score 1) 134

In the old days of newspapers, articles were fit together on paper and pictures help "soften" the text by breaking it up into smaller chunks. Also, people are more likely to read an article if the author's picture is also featured. So, it is really just an effort of the publisher to get more eyeballs on the article.

Comment Tesla vs Volt (Score 1) 199

Why does it take until 2022? By then we will have self-driving cars. The Chevy Volt needed a software upgrade and had to be returned to the dealership with all the associated hassles. http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/1... Tesla has been upgrading their software OTA for more than a year. You go to bed and in the morning you have a car that works better and is more capable (for example, adding autopilot). I'll take that any day of the week.

Submission + - New study suggests flying is greener than driving

Desert Leap writes: The Washington Post reports a new study that suggests it is more environmentally friendly to fly rather than to drive. Analysis from the University of Michigan Transport Research Institute found that driving uses 57% more energy than flying per passenger mile. This is largely due to the number of occupied plane seats increasing while passengers per car decreased.

Of course, "results may vary" for individual trips depending on many factors, such as distance flown (long flights are more fuel efficient) and the kind of car and how many riders.

One factoid is interesting, it takes 4,211 BTUs per person mile to drive. This number will fall as we switch over to electric vehicles. For example, a Tesla Model S takes about 1,100 BTUs per vehicle mile. Will future aircraft be able to also make the switch to electric?

Comment 538 model provides better analysis (Score 2) 519

Nate Silver's 538 blog (http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/) is much more interesting. His model takes into account polls (which he adjusts based on past accuracy) as well as economic factors. Nate is currently estimating a probability of an Obama win at 77%. Probably a much more accurate assessment than an estimate of 98%. Nate Silver prediction for the 2008 presidential popular vote percentages was within 0.1% of the actual results.

Slashdot Top Deals

While money doesn't buy love, it puts you in a great bargaining position.

Working...