Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment "reimagine the private sector" (Score 1) 287

This is code for straight-up Socialism or Chinese Style "Capitalism". Picking winners and losers by the Government.

I would instantly agree that we need to stop picking winners like we do now under Crony Capitalism, but putting that power more in the hands of Bureaucrats and Politicians is not the solution.

Comment Re:And how much is that from forced revenue? (Score 1) 52

Along those same lines, Windows 11 is dropping support for older Intel Processors lacking certain features. Supposedly, it's to improve virtualization, but how much would it cost to just not support that virtualization as well on older processors?

It's a boon to PC manufacturers that push Windows 11. The big PC makers say "Works best with Windows!" on their websites and don't highlight or give you any price break on units with Linux installed. Didn't I read that MS requires that they get a payment for every PC sold, whether it runs Windows or not as part of their licensing agreement with the manufacturers? I know the manufacturers get a big break on Windows copies from retail.

I thought Apple should have bought Dell when Dell went private a few years ago, made PCs with no Windows advantage, pushed Linux and maybe even Darwin on these new PCs. I'm not saying don't sell Windows too. They could keep the Dell and marketing separate to not dilute the Apple brand. They would have enjoyed massive buying power for PC parts, screens, batteries, SDs. They could have gotten Dell for a tiny fraction of their massive war chest a few years ago. Could have had most of it financed, too, just like the deal to go private did. This idea might have faced anti-trust scrutiny.

Apple should have recognized that MS wasn't going away and as long as they are there, they are a potential huge competitor in many of their markets.

It would have also been revenge for the obnoxious remarks Michael Dell made back in the 90s when Apple was experiencing hard times.

Comment The horror of Ruby (Score 0) 148

When I hear "Ruby on rails" I imagine a girl called Ruby, tied to the train rails, shouting in horror. Hence, It's a poor name selection.

Also, Ruby On Rails is related to the demise of one of the companies I worked at. They started a new project and some new employee decided to do it in Ruby. Bad idea since he was the only one in the company who was familiar with it! After a while that employee flipped out and left the company. The company had to hire some another company to finish that project, which wasted a lot of money. That started the downward spiral, which began with delayed salaries and ended with total bankruptcy.

Also I don't like that the tool for installing Ruby packages is called gem. Why pollute the namespace like that? It should have been called ruby-gem instead.

So while I don't have much idea how Ruby is good or not, I just have mostly bad experience with it. Bye Ruby!

Slashdot Top Deals

"Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch." -- Robert Orben

Working...