So you have irrefutable evidence that global warming is due to fossil fuel combustion products and not, say, the output of the sun?
Yes, pretty much. Hardly anything is totally "irrefutable", but there is plenty of evidence which supports the link between warming and CO2, including the paleoclimate record, the observed timing, rate, and magnitude of the warming compared to the CO2 forcing (when other forcings are included too, of course), the stratospheric cooling fingerprint, the observed changes in the diurnal cycle, etc.
Al Gore's cartoons notwithstanding, C02 levels follow warming trends rather than precede them. So any linkage cannot be attributed to cause.
Furthermore, we have not seen any further warming since 2001. That's a 7 year pause in warming that cannot possibly be attributed to decreases in fossil fuel consumption.
So, no there is nothing even close to irrefutable much less insinuating a human-caused warming trend.
Personally, I find it absurd that anyone could put their faith in a global cooperative government solution to global warming. Governments are good for one thing - that is to break your leg, hand you a crutch and exclaim "See, if it weren't for us, you couldn't walk!"
If man really is the cause of warming, it won't be the governments that reverse the trend.