Comment Timex Sinclair (Score 1) 523
Comment Re:Ass backwards (Score 1) 64
Comment Re:Don't stop now! (Score 1) 165
Comment Re:Anti-Apple Bias (Score 1) 165
Comment Re:The entire OS/2 2.0 fiasco (Score 2) 93
Comment Re:OS/2 Warp 4: Better than modern Linux. (Score 1) 93
Comment Re:Light on tech details as usual (Score 2) 64
Comment Re:Wankery (Score 1) 64
http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...
Comment Re:Irony (Score 0) 64
But it's OK. Apple make this money back in about an hour.
Comment Re:I'd have rather have six identical USB ports (Score 1) 70
2x USB 3.0
4x USB 2.0
Comment Re:Why redesign the wheel (Score 4, Insightful) 186
Comment Re:Poor innocent Apple (Score 1) 84
It is also probably the reason that Apple didn't even consider Linux for their OS.
They went with NeXTSTEP, which was released three years before there ever was a Linux. And of course NeXT was Steve Job's baby.
They were concerning BeOS, which I always thought was an interesting operating system. A copy of it came with my PowerComputing Mac clone.
Comment Re:Poor innocent Apple (Score 2) 84
They took parts of FreeBSD, NetBSD, and Mach/BSD, since it runs on the Mach kernel. Windows NT and SUN Solaris also use BSD code.
The BSD License allows proprietary use and allows the software released under the license to be incorporated into proprietary products. So how did they steal anything? The parts they did use, they released as Darwin, which is open source, and is composed of code developed by Apple, as well as code derived from NeXTSTEP, BSD, and other free software projects.
So where's the problem? They followed the BSD License, and give credit. You can see it when you boot macOS in verbose mode. And they released their modified code as open source. This includes things like WebKit.