Comment Re:Annoying and useless summary (Score 1) 294
This is a very annoying Slashdot article. The article is about "leading scientists have said"-- no. Please, tell me who, not just "leading scientists". And the source is "From a report" -- wait what report? Issued by who?
The link in the summary is to a Guardian article, where the link is to... another Guardian article. Way down in the article, they tell us that the report they're referring to is a "United in Science" (who the heck is that?) report published in the journal Joule.
put that up front, please, and give us a link to that source, not just the useless Guardian article.
Yeah, The Guardian wants to increase traffic to their articles, big deal. Luckily for us, we have wonderful search engines to find the page of "United in Science". On that page, you will find direct links to the report in pdf, as well as some information about who they are:
" This report has been compiled by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) under the direction of the United Nations Secretary-General to bring together the latest climate science-related updates from key global partner organizations – WMO, Global Carbon Project (GCP), UN Environment Programme (UNEP), Met Office (United Kingdom), Urban Climate Change Research Network (UCCRN), UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), World Climate Research Programme (WCRP, jointly sponsored by WMO, IOC-UNESCO and the International Science Council (ISC)) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The content of each chapter is attributable to each respective organization."