Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Keep up or shut up (Score 1) 785

I've have to disagree with the characterization that IT changes faster than healthcare. Consider just as a starting point that the two major journals in the field (the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association) publish weekly, and if an important finding comes out in one of these journals, practitioners much change quickly or risk lawsuits. I'm thinking in particular of when the finding was published that an HIV positive pregnant mother should take AZT to greatly lower the risk that her child would also become HIV positive. Immediately after that article was published, practitioners starting using AZT prenatally.

On the other hand, in IT, technology changes, but if it's a corporately driven technology, generally there is a roadmap and announcements about the technology before it's available for use, and if it's not a corporately driven technology, interest tends to build over time, instead of immediately.

Image

Dad Delivers Baby Using Wiki 249

sonamchauhan writes "A Londoner helped his wife deliver their baby by Googling 'how to deliver a baby' on his mobile phone. From the article: 'Today proud Mr Smith said: "The midwife had checked Emma earlier in the day but contractions started up again at about 8pm so we called the midwife to come back. But then everything happened so quickly I realized Emma was going to give birth. I wasn't sure what I was going to do so I just looked up the instructions on the internet using my BlackBerry."'"
Programming

Can rev="canonical" Replace URL-Shortening Services? 354

Chris Shiflett writes "There's a new proposal ('URL shortening that doesn't hurt the Internet') floating around for using rev="canonical" to help put a stop to the URL-shortening madness. In order to avoid the great linkrot apocalypse, we can opt to specify short URLs for our own pages, so that compliant services (adoption is still low, because the idea is pretty fresh) will use our short URLs instead of TinyURL.com (or some other third-party alternative) replacements."
Patents

IBM's But-I-Only-Got-The-Soup Patent 267

theodp writes "In an Onion-worthy move, the USPTO has decided that IBM inventors deserve a patent for splitting a restaurant bill. Ending an 8+ year battle with the USPTO, self-anointed patent system savior IBM got a less-than-impressed USPTO Examiner's final rejection overruled in June and snagged US Patent No. 7,457,767 Tuesday for its Pay at the Table System. From the patent: 'Though US Pat. No. 5,933,812 to Meyer, et al. discussed previously provides for an entire table of patrons to pay the total bill using a credit card, including the gratuity, it does not provide an ability for the check to be split among the various patrons, and for those individual patrons to then pay their desired portion of the bill. This deficiency is addressed by the present invention.'"

Comment Re:Question to all you bioinformaticians (Score 1) 175

True, and to relate the above back to the main topics of this site, the reason we need to use crystallography to determine the structure of a protein is that we currently possess nowhere near the amount of computing power necessary to derive a protein's structure simply from the sequence of amino acids that make up the protein.

Slashdot Top Deals

Mathematics is the only science where one never knows what one is talking about nor whether what is said is true. -- Russell

Working...