Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Why not remove the screen too (Score 2) 675

Or the headphone jack!

When asked if it’s "inconsistent" for the MacBook Pro to retain the traditional headphone jack (another widely-used connector that Apple has dropped from the iPhone) Schiller says that professionals still need that on a laptop for other types of audio gear that doesn't work wirelessly.

Did Phill miss that there was a dongle for that?

He adds that he’s been surprised by the criticism, but says the decision to only use Thunderbolt ports was a "bold risk" and Apple will "help people through these changes."

He also forgot to mention how they were going to help: By providing expensive dongles at a high margin.

Comment Re:FOIA requests (Score 1) 268

Did you read even the summary?

Clinton replied, "Let's get [a] separate address or device but I don't want any risk of the personal [e-mail] being accessible."

Though the bigger question is why would Clinton be using her employer's email system for personal emails? Here in the private sector that is explicitly forbidden in every employee handbook I've ever read.

Comment Why stop with snapchat? (Score 1) 496

They should sue the car manufacturer for making a car that could go 107MPH.
The DOT for making a road that is decent enough for a car to travel 107MPH.
The cell company for allowing connections to their cell towers while the user is traveling 107MPH.
The phone maker for not detecting that the car was traveling 107MPH.
The police for not pulling him over before he crashed into their car while traveling at 107MPH.


Snapchat is only the tip of the iceberg here.

Comment Nanny state alert! (Score 5, Insightful) 556

"I have concern about a PlayStation that my grandchildren might use," she said, "and a predator getting on the other end, and talking to them, and it's all encrypted. I think there really is reason to have the ability, with a court order, to be able to get into that."

If you are so worried about a predator talking to your grandchildren through the Playstation network, why are they using it unsupervised?

Take care of your own problems, don't make the government do it for you.

Comment Re:How can there be? (Score 1) 622

Comcast themselves have even admitted

reference?

ArsTechnica: http://arstechnica.com/busines...

Why are you trialing usage-based billing?

The Internet ecosystem is changing constantly and we decided back in May 2012 to replace our static 250GB usage threshold with more flexible data usage management approaches that offer more choice, flexibility and fairness for all customers. Customers can choose to use as much Internet as they want, and those who choose to use more pay more, while those who use less can pay less. The vast majority of ISPs, large and small, have some version of data usage plans in place.

You are right, when everyone is using the pipe at the same time, there will be degradation. So why not charge for internet access like electricity? Make it cheaper during non-peak hours and convert to fully usage-based billing. No flat fee for access, or at most a very small one.

To answer my own question here with part of your comment: it would be really confusing to customers.

Comment Re:How can there be? (Score 1) 622

That is a poor comparison in my opinion.

Preparing and delivering the food actually costs a relatively high amount of money (price paid compared to cost to prepare and deliver). For an ISP, once they have all of their infrastructure in place, it costs them pennies per customer per GB to deliver that data and the data itself doesn't cost anything since they are just the conduit.

A better comparison is that the ISP is a company that manages the piping for you to get water. You pay a arbitrarily high price dependent on the size of that pipe. Now, this company doesn't create or manage the water (as much as they might want to), they just manage the infrastructure for getting it to you.They then decide to also start charging you for the amount of water that flows through that pipe.

Does that make sense to you?

Don't forget that this company receives millions in federal funding and they also wanted to charge the water making companies for being able to use the pipes.

Slashdot Top Deals

You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish. You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tuna fish. -- from the tunefs(8) man page

Working...