Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - US Supreme Court upholds removal of works from Pub (wsj.com) 2

langelgjm writes: While much of the web is focused on the SOPA and PIPA blackout, supporters of the public domain today quietly lost a protracted struggle that began back in 2001.The Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, rejected the argument that Congress did not have the power to convey copyright upon works that were already in the public domain. The suit was originally filed to challenge provisions that the U.S. adopted when signing the TRIPs agreement. Justices Breyer and Alito dissented, arguing that conveyed copyright on already existing works defied the logic of copyright law. Justice Kagan recused herself. The text of the opinions is available here (PDF).

Comment Re:Let's bring everyone on the same page (Score 1) 1505

You hit the nail on the head.

The judge is an idiot.

He's in a country where the hospitals are REQUIRED to treat the sick, regardless of their insurance status.

A law requiring insurance is only logical, and fair.

Those are State Laws, and should be dealt with on a State level.

Comment Re:Wow (Score 1) 1505

RomneyCare is a State making the decision, wholly Constitutional. Obamacare is the federal government declaring this, completely un-Constitutional. The difference here is that the Constitution does not enumerate a power that grants the federal government the ability to force you to buy health insurance, but it does not stop states from doing so.

Comment Re:So we are going to bicker over 3 billion? (Score 1) 245

Sometimes you have to let something die in order to make something greater. If a bank can't survive because it made bad loans, let it go. If it crashes the economy for a while, we will learn from the experence. Maybe we will learn a very important leasson about risk vs. reward. The problem is we wont learn this leason. The leasson we will learn today is "Daddy Government will make it all better... for now."

I wonder why everyone thinks we have "Rights" to physical things. All "Rights" are effemeral; life, liberty, justice, freedom, religion. Nobody has a "right" to a job, money, food, shelter, or medicine. Physical things are needs and wants, not "Rights". Needs and wants need to be supplied by the person, or by charity freely given, and in a socity where their "Rights" are protected they are Free to do so.

Darth Eggbert

Comment Re:No, it proves there is water vapor (Score 1) 186

First, we have to determine 1) if it is worth spending so much money and, likely, [B]lives [/b] to go visit. And for that you can send a robot and

Many people will volenteer their lives for the chance at going to Mars, please let them worry about the worth of them. I personally would take a 50-50 chance to be the first to stand on another planet. Others might not reqire odds that high.

Slashdot Top Deals

The cost of feathers has risen, even down is up!

Working...