The first sentence says that many AI bugs are "low-quality and sometimes entirely fabricated vulnerabilities generated by AI". It is unlikely that fabricated vulnerabilities will affect an OS.

Potential power generation does not mean solar and wind farms magically appear overnight. Infrastructure like transmission lines also do not appear out of nowhere. You're also talking about deep red Texas which cares little about regulation. The problem is not Abbott is against any data centers forever. The problem is even in Texas, the infrastructure is struggling to cope right now.

Apple uses 256 bit AES from what I remember. Theoretically using a single computer, it would take 10^59 years to crack a single key. Using all world’s computers including supercomputers, it will be less but not meaningfully less.

Yes, UK government wants Apple to modify their entire encryption scheme so that Apple can grant the UK government access to user data anytime that government asks. Existing data is protected unless Apple is forced to replace existing keys.

Every screener I saw was back in the day of DVDs. A friend of mine worked for a video rental place and they got screeners a once in a while. Most of them were B movies that may have not been released so it was not as if we got to see blockbusters early or for free.

What part of "Before Covid Dell had generous remote work policies" is unclear to you?

The people I know worked remotely for Dell a decade before Covid, and Dell had no issues with them living hours away from an office .

Wow you really don't understand the point. Team members live several states or countries from each other. When you have a large global company like Dell, that will happen.

WTF are you talking about "risk/reward" analysis. I'll say it again: Before Covid Dell had generous remote work policies. No one said Dell people lived in a cabin in Alaska. They just lived far away from a Dell office. People, based on those policies, lived a few hours from an office rather than 30 minutes from an office. And Dell encouraged it.

Affordable housing is just one reason why people would prefer not to live whenever you want them to live. Clean air, better schools. etc.

No you're not very smart if you think not living close to a Dell office == living in Alaska. Your entire assumption is based on very flawed logic.

Dell for one. I am sure you heard of that company. Before Covid Dell had generous remote work policies. So people moved to places they wanted to live rather than near a Dell office. Now they might have to travel hours to an office that will not hold everyone. Also Dell has many offices so team members may not be geographically located near each other. I know a few employees who have to drive hours into work so that they can attend Zoom meeting with their team who might be in another state or even country.

The Bright Angel trail starts from the south rim of the Grand Canyon. The starting point is where many people take pictures with tour buses stopping there. It starts the 2,000 foot (600m) descent into the canyon. I hiked it to the first campground and back up which is about 4-5 hours. You would be surprised how many people I saw start the descent with no water and unsuitable shoes. There is a ranger standing part way down to stop hikers who were not properly geared.

While some companies allowed employees more ability to work remote due to Covid, some companies had those policies before Covid as they did not have enough office space for their employees. Now those companies are mandating workers make long commutes just to fight for desks.

This is pure speculation but what if an employee seeing all these hard drives lying around formatted them and sold them because everything is so expensive now?

I think "screener" means specifically a copy that clearly displays that it is not the release version. For example text appearing the entire movie that say "This is a screener and property of [company]". Other aspects like the movie becomes black in white randomly. Time markings appear randomly in the frame.

I think everyone here is pointing out you could read the summary past the first sentence. I would agree with you that the word "stolen" should not be in the first sentence but the rest of the summary details the situation. Netflix was given a hard drive with a movie. Netflix lost it or it is believed to have been stolen along other hard drives.

Obviously. "Guy’s got range."—Detective Peralta

Wait till he finds out about Captain Corelli's Mandolin

Remember kids, the reason we never got a Forrest Gump 2 is because the first one lost money according to Paramount. So they didn’t pay royalties to the author. The author sued and settled with Paramount for an undisclosed amount. Technically he never got royalties for Forrest Gump; Paramount paid him the money for rights to the unwritten sequel. The author then wrote Forrest Gump 2 with Forrest as the most unlikable character and put Forrest in bizarre and outlandish plot contrivances.

You asked why passengers like me would choose to fly nonstop as opposed to fly with stops. And there are many reasons why I would choose that. But according to you, I am wrong for having my own opinion.

Of course it is. You outlined all the preferences you have including using Singapore Airlines. Therefore Qantas Airlines should never create a flight you would not take. Everyone should have less choice because of your preferences.

So I should believe you over Qantas that is doing feasibility analysis. But again, Qantas should not try because you said so.

What are you talking about? That happens now. To leave Australia to London requires stops in places you may not want to stop. Also you do know that multiple airlines exist, right? If Qantas creates this flight, you can still fly your Singapore Airlines with a stop in Singapore. There are multiple airlines you will be able to choose if you want to stop. You are treating Qantas giving other people a nonstop option as them taking away your option that you would never choose. Your entire argument is everyone should make your choice.