Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:So - the fact that others are doing it makes it (Score 1) 312

As this is an Australian story, you should be using the correct terminology. Tax evasion and tax avoidance are the same thing. It's tax minimisation that's the legal one.

Disclaimer: I'm an Australian that worked in the Australian finance industry for ten years, and have qualifications in financial planning. Tax avoidance will get you in trouble here.

Comment Re:What I want to know is... (Score 1) 136

Why all the stories I hear about mass-lawsuits over piracy seem to be for crappy films like Dallas Buyers Club and that Hurt Locker thing.

While I haven't actually been sued over pirating (I'm Australian), I've received plenty of copyright infringement notices.

The last one I received was for "48Hrs", a 1982 Eddie Murphy/Nick Nolte movie. (I was feeling nostalgic.) This was about 2 weeks ago.

They're not just going after downloaders of new or recent movies, or limiting the list to movies that failed at the box office (48Hrs did well enough to get a sequel).

Comment Re:I'm all for it (Score 1) 832

I can understand having to pay extra for MPEG-2 support in a piece of software or hardware, as there are licensing issues with a third party, but you're Intel. This is your chip.

Not quite. Since AMD's 64 bit extensions to x86 became the de facto standard (over Intel's IA64 Itanium), Intel has had to licence x86-64 from AMD and is required to pay royalties. Yes, AMD has to pay royalties to Intel for x86 (and more) and they probably do some royalty-swap deals, but it's not quite as clear cut as "this is your chip".

But yeah, I agree this is a money-hungry cash grab and a dick move by Intel.

Comment Re:Throttling to 28.8 Kb/s. (Score 1) 130

That's insane.

I'm paying $49.95 per month with TPG, which gives me 120GB per month, and they don't pretend that's "unlimited" (they actually have an unlimited plan).

I'm having trouble getting my head around a cap as low as 12GB being called unlimited. From memory, Optus counts uploads toward your cap, too.

Comment Re:Australian... with questions here (Score 3, Insightful) 222

So whilst it's great that we will have these kinds of speeds, how are we going to get data services fast enough to take advantage of them?

If you build it he will come.

At the moment, everything is overseas because it's not practical to have them here. As soon as we have the infrastructure in place, not only does it become more practical to mirror a lot of content and as well as provide additional services here, but it provides an underlying platform for new services to be created/invented.

You have to start somewhere :-)

Comment Re:Greedo shooting first is far more hated ... (Score 1) 495

While I agree that it's stupid that they made Greedo fire first, it was pretty obvious that if Han hadn't shot him, Greedo would have pulled his trigger


Greedo wanted to take Han to Jabba for the bounty, there was absolutely no chance he would have fired without Han forcing his hand. He even offered to let Han go if he bribed Greedo with Jabba's money. Han briefly tried talking his way out of it, but got visibly pissed when Greedo brought the Falcon into the conversation.

Greedo would NOT have fired unprovoked, not a chance.

For a Slashdotter, you really don't know your Star Wars very well.

Comment Re:I wasn't impressed with it at the theatre (Score 1) 387

It seemed to me to at least have a better plot then many many other movies, not that that is saying all that much.

My farts smell better than many other peoples farts. Doesn't mean you want a lung full.

Personally I really enjoyed Avatar and thought it should of been longer, but then I was more interested in learning more about Pandora the world then the story.

Good luck. Gargamel has been trying to get info on that place for decades, but keeps getting foiled at the last minute. Azriel has had no luck, either.

Comment Re:Really? (Score 1) 387

It might not be original, and maybe people can say "Oh pocahontas did it first!" but that doesn't change that it was a suspenseful, well-made film with some good points that people could think about.

How can it be suspenseful when you've seen it a dozen times before? I wasn't even thinking of Pocahontas, I was think of Dances with Wolves (the South Park guys agree - the mocked it with "Dances with Smurfs"). It's a very old and rehashed plot.

This is Slashdot. Of course popular movies (with their comfortable, predictable, paint-by-numbers plot) are going to be panned. The movies that don't follow a formula are never mainstream-popular, and the ones I like might not be the ones you like, so there'll never be consensus there.

Get over yourself. If you want to turn your brain off and follow the herd (hurd?) don't be surprised when thinkers look down on you.

Comment Re:iPad? Seriously? (Score 1) 622

and his Gentoo compiling microwave oven

My microwave compiles NetBSD , you insensitive clod!

Get over it, dude. Go take something apart.

Easier said than done. These unwashed masses are diminishing my options, and are dumbing down my devices. I can tune out most of the world-I-don't-care-about, but once that world starts impacting on my world, it's overly simplistic to dismiss my concerns with a "get over it" throwaway line.

Comment Re:...And one generation behind on HTML5 (Score 1) 341

Why is it that all Opera users assume they've discovered some grand secret, some golden app that trumps everything else and only they know about - and they must proselytise!

Look, this is Slashdot, we all know about Opera, we've all tried it, yet we don't use it. Get over it. Opera isn't "the shit", it's just shit.

Comment Re:No, what Apple's products are is fashionable (Score 0, Offtopic) 497

The iTunes lockin was necessary to keep the record labels from suing the living crap out of Apple

I hear this from Apple apologists a lot. And no matter how often you repeat it, it doesn't make it true

Apple loves lock-in. It had nothing to do with the labels. Apple could have licenced Fairplay to anybody, but they didn't, because they love lock-in. The labels wanted Apple to licence Fairplay to thirds parties, because it would have increased their revenue and increased marketshare, but apple loves lock-in, so they didn't.

Apple is a walled garden. They've never claimed otherwise (well, their fans do).

Slashdot Top Deals

Wishing without work is like fishing without bait. -- Frank Tyger