Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
User Journal

Journal Journal: Go bowling?

Recently saw the documentary "Bowling for Columbine." Excellent, to be put simply. Also upgraded my collection of various virtual dub versions (most importantly, one that can interleave MP3 format audio.)
Other than that, nothing new
User Journal

Journal Journal: boredom

multiplayer maps will be my undoing.

it's not that they are difficult, it's that they are so damned boring and time consuming

other than that I am just generally bored.

ventures with Maya aren't going so well either, damned fundamentals is impossibly difficult to understand and even when I do I don't learn much (note to self: save up money and buy foundation, quickly)

User Journal

Journal Journal: whoa...

Dear god, I haven't been back to slahsdot since forever...
new news: C&C: Generals came out, have one more campaign and ten more multiplayer maps to go until completion, Aunt Moe died (major suck, she was my favorite aunt), Dad's side of tha family is being nice to my mom again though, so that's all good
anywho, not much else

Comment blow it up (Score 1) 710

Fancying myself as a photographer I've gone to both ends of the spectrum. In the end neither will ever replace the other, they are both completely diffrent arts with diffrent people who'd use them. Digital: Digital is the epitomy of easy and cheap, and quite often good quality. Even with a $5000 camera, you will probably save money. I spent $300 on my camera and probably a good $1000 a year on film and processing. The one huge downside I have to digital is that no matter how hard they have tried they can't get proper colour reproduction (this can, however be fixed with PSP, or another program with proper capabilities) 35mm: Definently more clear. Doesn't matter how many megapixels you have, when you blow up a 35mm print and digital print next to each other, that's when you'll notice a diffrence. Not likely that you'll blow it up large enough for someone to care though. The other thing is, 35mm films offer some interesting effects that they haven't gotten to digital yet (unless I missed something, and they just may soon.) Things like Bracketing, and Multiple exposures are just not avalible on digital (not to mention burn ins, but those are not generally liked). The only thing that has really deterred me from digitalis is the inability to take clear shots in the dark. I have taken a shot in the dead of night (still, mind you) and it comes out sharper, and a bit less intense than during the day, but mainly it is perfectly clear. Where digital leads away is that most of the cameras don't have sensitive enough photographic plates, so it digitally fills in light which then makes your picture look like there was gauze over the lens. I am personally partial to 35mm, more for the challenge than anything to do with proper colour reproduction or clarity. I find that after using 35mm, digital seems like cheating, it's too easy. Not to mention some of my favorite shots would have been completely impossible in digital. I do not, however, have a snotty attitude about digital, diffrent strokes for diffrent folks is the way I see it. My stroke is just 35mm

Slashdot Top Deals

How many weeks are there in a light year?

Working...