What is being done to improve the Linux Kernel documentation in both structure and completeness?

A good white paper was already written about what needs to be improved and yet the mailing list discussions are just endless bike shedding. Here is the white paper:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols... There appears to be no person who the buck stops with. Furthermore based on 3 years of reading the mailing list I seriously doubt more than 2-5 people on the mailing list actually understand what good documentation is, let alone how to write it.

I would just like to point out the OGRE - Open Source 3D Graphics Engine which is MIT licensed and has been around since 2001. OGRE is a better built system and the games in the gallery show this off.

Yes and I can tell you exactly why it failed. Look at who was writing it David E. Kelley. He did Ally McBeal, Boston Legal, L.A. Law, and The Practice. Notice the trend of the kind of shows this guy developers. How is someone who makes essentially throw away TV shows going to handle the clash between modern and mythos? Kelley messed it up big time, he delivered what he thought was good instead of what the fans wanted.

The best written Wonder Woman comics are the ones Greg Rucka did. Read those and you can see what a good story and character look like.

If your going to dump the printer then why not try a local recycling company as to not create more e-waste. Some cities have non-profits like FreeGeek [ freegeek.org ] that can re-use computer equipment.

I did the install and the first few things I remember doing were configuring a script to use my modem. Dialing my friend up and using ytalk to chat while rebuilding the kernel to get my video driver and sound card working so I could use X and Netscape.

Now days the installer does everything for you except wireless well. I still have some problems with soundcards and video cards in this modern era but it is mostly due to closed source drivers and not having configured the kernel wrong.