Every time somebody talks about "climate change" and the "extreme weather it causes" is pushing the idea that our planet's environment is undergoing some rapid change and it's just not the case. "global warming" hasn't been proved to be anything more than typical climate change thats natural to our planet. Anybody insulting those who have that stance are ignorant to do so because if they looked at the actual science (not these "97% of climate scientists agree" fuckers who misrepresent scientific papers and studies but real scientists you would see there is by NO means a large consensus among scientists that man made climate change is causing extreme weather. So let them sling their insults, hold your head up high knowing you go off facts not propaganda.

I just came here to say I chuckled when I read "the current crisis over Russia". Beating the hell outta that dead horse, is there so much desperation that this is where they end up? The big bad Major Russia influence and collusion to tip the election was....REPORTS (of course from a Anon source) of a pin drop amount of money buyings ad's on FB, a whopping...three thousand? LMFAO it's really getting kind of sad now. Hilary you lost because you're a horrible person and corrupt to the core, not because of Russia, not because or racism. Because you were the worst possible candidate to run in 2016 for democrats, so bad in fact you had to rig the nomination to make sure you were the candidate over the more popular Sanders.

In a way isn't the public endorsement worse? Who you think holds more influence random ad's on facebook or the previous POTUS? I'd be willing to bet Obama's words were MUCH more impactful towards another nations election that a few ad's on FB were.

To be fair if you actually look into the emails there are valid questions to be raised, the fact that police refused to even acknowledge that is a big driving point of Pizzagate. It's fake? Ok well why don't you investigate the legitimate questions and show us, just saying "nothing to see here move along" raises more suspicion. Police should have investigated to make sure it was fake, they never did. "conspiracy theories" While usually BS HAVE come out to be true (usually much much later) so if there is evidence to support something that major, even if it's a little...why not look into it?

The crisis is keeping the Russia story alive.

I have to disagree, Hilary and the DNC working together to ensure she got the nomination over Sanders is what put the last nail in the coffin so to speak. If they didn't work against Sanders and he had a fair chance I believe he could have beaten Trump in the Election. Hilary was a very disliked candidate with a lot of political baggage (not no gossip "omg did you hear what __ said X years ago!!" baggage) So yea the Democrats, or more specifically the DNC and Hilary really did screw the pooch.

O rly? Oh man you tried to insult the wrong persons intelligence. Lemme give you a vocabulary lesson.

ethnic
[eth-nik]

1. pertaining to or characteristic of a people, especially a group (ethnic group) sharing a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like.

2. referring to the origin, classification, characteristics, etc., of such groups.

3. being a member of an ethnic group, especially of a group that is a minority within a larger society

4. of, relating to, or characteristic of members of such a group.

5. belonging to or deriving from the cultural, religious, or linguistic traditions of a people or country

6. (of a human being) displaying characteristics, as in physical appearance, language, or accent, that can cause one to be identified by others as a member of a minority ethnic group:

7. Obsolete. pagan; heathen.

noun
8. a member of an ethnic group.


Care to revisit that retard statement? Because it sure does seem that by DEFINITION that people who share the same religion are considered an ethnic group.

You should probably at least look up the definition of a word before you call somebody a retard and claim they misused it, might make yourself out to be somebody who lacks intelligence themselves.

I'm not fully sold on the "climate change" things, too many conflicting arguments and honestly most people who argue on either side don't really have a clue. Too many politics injected into the climate change debate, it's moved too far from science. Past that though I'm fine with Trump taking a step back, it's kinda old for everybody to expect the US to spear head every damn thing, even when it hurts us economically. It's time to let the rest of the world step up and take some weight out of the US's backpack. Maybe once the rest of the world starts making sacrifices then the US can jump back into the fray but damnit no more of the US doing most of the leg work on everything. As it's been mentioned above, why should the US hurt it's self economically with regulations and such when A) Climate change isn't a proven thing, still just an argued theory. B) nothing the US can do will reduce pollution levels if other countries (such a schina) don't also make some effort. I'm not saying trash our environment I'm just saying if this is such an important issue to the world maybe it's time the world showed it, because apparently if the US isn't spearheading something it's a lost cause or some shit?

Care to cite your source? Last I heard France had a law that prevented the collection of ethnic data..

That's your opinion. It's a good thing I know I'm well educated and bother to research things from a neutral perspective because otherwise you might just be right about me.

I'm amazed with all the issues the french people are facing due to their open borders that people were willing to just keep the status quo going.

Lol they lump Fox in with RT but leave out one of the worst MSM sources CNN. CNN has shown time and time again to leave out key facts or just report plain out wrong or unverified information. But yea Fox and RT are the ones of concern ;)

So they are doing this...but I STILL can't get anything better than DSL and I live in VA...right on the coast....

Ok so they changed the definition of what "broadband" is. Now the question is what will they do to help all those who have no access to high speed internet? Or those who are stuck with the crappy DSL services that run on copper networks that provided like Verizon let degrade? I don't see how changing this definition will help the situation of the sub par internet servicesin the US. Big deal Verizon can't call their DSL "Broadband" anymore, they will use a new term and nothing will change.

I'm right there with ya, only the monopoly in my area is shitty Verizon DSL, talk about being stuck with a single bad choice.