Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment The real question (Score 4, Insightful) 86

Why the hell would I use a platform purposefully made so that Google can datamine the living shit out of my personal interactions with all my friends and family and spam me with ads while I am talking to them so they can sell me ads to the highest bidder and make more money? It's the equivalents of pigs saying "Wow this slaughter house is so cool, they have free food and it's so comfortable! I think I'm going to stay here!". No thank you. I will keep using Signal and Telegram. Anyone who cares about these gimmicky features is a retard.

Comment Encrypt every single device you own (Score 2) 392

All my computers and smartphones have full disk encryption enabled. I don't want thieves to have the ability to play with my data. How is that not a perfectly legitimate use? I travel frequently and if my phone or laptop was stolen, without encryption, a thief could extract all the data, steal my identity and make my life a living hell. Also currently in Canada when you cross the border you can have your devices confiscated. If the agents want to inspect them and are unable to they will then be sent to Ottawa, where the border services will attempt to forensically extract data from the drive to look for "evidence". When you're at the border your protections against unreasonable searches are no more. Suppose I go to a tropical country and the border agents want to inspect the devices of every single man who comes back out to look for evidence allowing them to catch pedophiles who engaged in child sexual tourism. They will not find anything about you, but they will surely find some material somewhere that could be constructed as damaging. Or suppose you visited 4chan and on it where was a lolicon avatar that was loaded without your knowledge and it is still in your browser cache, it could be potentially illegal in your legislature. There are many ways where this can backfire against you. This is why I fully encrypt and wipe my devices before crossing the border and I advise everyone to do the same. We have so little privacy in this world, you can bet I will use encryption to protect my private life from prying eyes. These prosecutors can plead and gesticule all they want, however the genie is not getting back into the bottle.

Submission + - When phone encryption blocks justice (nytimes.com)

DaDaDaaaaa writes: The New York Times features a joint op-ed piece by prosecutors from Manhattan, Paris, London and Spain, in which the default use by Apple and Google of full disk encryption in their latest smartphone OSes (iOS 8 and Android Lollipop, respectively) is decried. They talk about the murder scene of a father of six, where an iPhone 6 and a Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge were found.

"An Illinois state judge issued a warrant ordering Apple and Google to unlock the phones and share with authorities any data therein that could potentially solve the murder. Apple and Google replied, in essence, that they could not — because they did not know the user’s passcode. The homicide remains unsolved. The killer remains at large."

The case is made to push lawmakers to legislate in order to force Apple and Google to include backdoors into their smartphone operating systems. However one has to wonder about the legitimate uses of full disk encryption which can allow to protect good people from harm, or to prevent them from having their privacy needlessly intruded upon.

Comment Re:Slander and libel (Score 1) 305

Great analogy. When I see the Slashdot libertarians, always adamant that Google's results must not be tampered with in any way even when it deprives innocent individuals of living their life in peace for no good reason, I wonder if they would be so steadfast if by some whim of circumstance their name was associated to something humiliating or nasty in Google and they couldn't find any employment due to it.

Comment Re:Security software is like birth control (Score 1) 228

I use Sandboxie with run restrictions for my browser, so it protects me from system changes, and no other programs can be started even in a worst case scenario. I use Opera and use the click to play function so that plug-ins only start when I authorize them. I also use Kaspersky because I got a copy for $10. Kaspersky used to be really bloated, but with the version 2013 I'm surprised at how light it is, I don't notice any performance hit. Kaspersky usually ranks among the highest, and seems to have fared well in all of these tests consistently over the years.

Comment Performance hit is unacceptable (Score 2) 242

Why are some people saying that there is no noticeable performance difference? I have used it on my Thinkpad with a Core 2 Duo from 2011 (AES to get the fastest performance) and with a hard drive it slows down all the time, making me believe that my computer is 7-8 years older. It slows down so bad when looking at a Flash video that it is practically unusable. When I use a SSD it is much better but there can still be very big problems. If I have to scan or decompress a file that's too big, most of the time the whole system will freeze. For a corporation that deals with extremely sensitive information this is fundamental. Else, it has benefits I'm sure, but it's a total pain.

Slashdot Top Deals

Everything that can be invented has been invented. -- Charles Duell, Director of U.S. Patent Office, 1899

Working...