
I can't find a fqa from that site that has been rectified since 1992. I would wager that most of the criticisms on the FQA are still valid on every c++ implementation as of today. (heck, let's even say by next year)
You don't know what you are talking about. There are very detailed paragraph by paragraph explanations on nearly every fqa. Serious flaws and problems, not just 'i don't like the way that works'. Architectural flaws that if you knew one language other than C++, would be obvious to you.
C++ is garbage, I write it every day. It's difficult to write, syntax is impossible to remember, silent errors, millions of gotcha's. there is nothing C++ does that some other language doesn't do better. It was a cheap hack to get classes in C++, and technologically relevant 30 years ago, why are people still praising it?
c++ is a rusty old bus, do you actually think it's a sports car?
If you had better tools, you could more effectively demonstrate your total incompetence.