Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Seems like this mostly hurts rural/minority are (Score 2, Insightful) 166

As in many newsrooms, his election in 2016 was greeted at NPR with a mixture of disbelief, anger, and despair. (Just to note, I eagerly voted against Trump twice but felt we were obliged to cover him fairly.)

There's more in there (a lot more) but you get the idea. I honestly couldn't care less if you want to deny it, downmod me, etc. Everything he's saying here is verifiable. The truth is there for you to see it, whether you want to or not.

The "truth" is that NPR covered a well-documented liar, fraud, and "reality" TV host, best known for wrecking everything he turned his attention to, and treated him as a credible presidential candidate. Honest coverage would have consisted of consistent reminders that Mr. Trump was grossly unfit for office and a danger to the nation. Instead, NPR (as with nearly all news coverage) acted (and largely still acts) as though it has an obligation to present some imaginary median point between the Democratic Party (who would be moderate right in many times and places) and whatever destructive madness the GOP pretends to care about this week.

Comment Re:Sanity? On WALL-STREET? (Score 1) 74

At that point, the whole thing could become beneficial to society again, instead of just making some already rich assholes even richer, while taking from everybody else.

This isn't some unwanted side-effect, though. *This the point.* Wall Street, the stock market, the entire finance sector may have been something else in the past, but it has primarily been a wealth-transfer engine for the benefits of those with wealth and connections, for decades. Just wait for the current hype cycle to come apart, and watch the government make the capitalist-class whole to the detriment of the public.

Comment Re:And I thought computer god was a daydream. (Score 1) 110

This firm faith in AI to solve all of humanity's problems is really, REALLY stupid to begin with, but thinking it's going to solve the two party gridlock we've suffered under here in the states? That's a step too far into the absurd. Somebody needs to bring these clowns back to reality. Or just figure out a way to have them fully consume the Kool Aide, upload themselves into their digital god, and get the fuck out of the way of those of us that just want to live a life in the real world.

The Marching Morons meets destructive uploads? The pitch is, "We euthanize you, disassemble your brain, and upload you into the cloud so that you can live in paradise forever". But the reality is "we kill you, then an LLM trained on your email and posting history imitates you (badly, but with nice visuals)". It's would be the techbro equivalent of a cult mass-suicide.

Yeah, I can see it. Forget perfect upload capability. We'll train this constantly wrong LLM algorithm on your data and you'll live forever, bro! Granted, you're digital ghost will need to continue to pay $19.95 a month forever, or it will be deleted. No freeloaders in digital heaven.

Nah. It'll be a one-time up-front fee of for "digital immortality". The additional fees will be for the surviving family members to pay for access to the simulacrum of their departed.

Comment Re:And I thought computer god was a daydream. (Score 2) 110

This firm faith in AI to solve all of humanity's problems is really, REALLY stupid to begin with, but thinking it's going to solve the two party gridlock we've suffered under here in the states? That's a step too far into the absurd. Somebody needs to bring these clowns back to reality. Or just figure out a way to have them fully consume the Kool Aide, upload themselves into their digital god, and get the fuck out of the way of those of us that just want to live a life in the real world.

The Marching Morons meets destructive uploads? The pitch is, "We euthanize you, disassemble your brain, and upload you into the cloud so that you can live in paradise forever". But the reality is "we kill you, then an LLM trained on your email and posting history imitates you (badly, but with nice visuals)". It's would be the techbro equivalent of a cult mass-suicide.

Comment Re:It depends (Score 2) 43

I'm not sure that it's possible to come up with a way to throw AI systems out the back of a spaceship fast enough to make them viable as a propulsion system, no matter how much better they would be used that way.

Surely if you burn enough money fast enough, it can be used to generate some sort of thrust.

Slashdot Top Deals

In 1914, the first crossword puzzle was printed in a newspaper. The creator received $4000 down ... and $3000 across.

Working...