ChatGPT says:
The statement made by the Slashdot commenter that "'Theft' worked for AI" is not accurate. While it is true that some AI models are trained on large amounts of data, this data is not obtained through theft. The data used to train AI models is typically collected with the consent of users or comes from publicly available sources.
The training data used for AI models is crucial for their performance and generalization capabilities. It is important that this data is collected ethically and legally to ensure the trustworthiness and fairness of the AI systems developed.
Therefore, it is incorrect to suggest that theft is a valid or acceptable method for obtaining the data needed to train AI models. Ethical considerations and adherence to data privacy regulations are essential in the development and deployment of AI technologies.
A good reminder that ChatGPT and its ilk (including their corporate owners) don't just steal. They also lie.
It is a crime. 18 US Code Section 1924 - Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Documents or Material..
The previous poster already explained - the law is a cudgel the boss class uses when some of the proles get uppity and start doing things reserved for the boss class.
So they now measure Compute in MegaWatts
Just wait until I get my data center full of Cray X-MPs up and running. I'll have a GigaWatt of compute in no time!
As in many newsrooms, his election in 2016 was greeted at NPR with a mixture of disbelief, anger, and despair. (Just to note, I eagerly voted against Trump twice but felt we were obliged to cover him fairly.)
There's more in there (a lot more) but you get the idea. I honestly couldn't care less if you want to deny it, downmod me, etc. Everything he's saying here is verifiable. The truth is there for you to see it, whether you want to or not.
The "truth" is that NPR covered a well-documented liar, fraud, and "reality" TV host, best known for wrecking everything he turned his attention to, and treated him as a credible presidential candidate. Honest coverage would have consisted of consistent reminders that Mr. Trump was grossly unfit for office and a danger to the nation. Instead, NPR (as with nearly all news coverage) acted (and largely still acts) as though it has an obligation to present some imaginary median point between the Democratic Party (who would be moderate right in many times and places) and whatever destructive madness the GOP pretends to care about this week.
calling npr leftist is wild
but then again thats the intention isn't it, slander anything center/moderate/liberal as far left propaganda to legitimize your own right wing propaganda, only they have the truth
Hits the nail on the head.
At that point, the whole thing could become beneficial to society again, instead of just making some already rich assholes even richer, while taking from everybody else.
This isn't some unwanted side-effect, though. *This the point.* Wall Street, the stock market, the entire finance sector may have been something else in the past, but it has primarily been a wealth-transfer engine for the benefits of those with wealth and connections, for decades. Just wait for the current hype cycle to come apart, and watch the government make the capitalist-class whole to the detriment of the public.
He clearly wanted the job. He's a space enthusiast. Even if he has to work within a restrictive political framework he's going to bring science and motivation to getting mankind into space in a big way.
Are you talking about Von Braun or Isaacman?
2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League