Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Change is needed! (Score 3, Insightful) 40

As a sports fan, I am deeply conflicted about broadcasting rights, particularly with the emergence of DAZN. On the one hand, I understand the need to protect the rights and interests of broadcasters, who have invested heavily in securing equipment, personnel, and exclusive rights to telecast live sports events, such as MLB and NFL games. These broadcasters rely on advertisements, subscriptions, and other revenue streams to recoup their investment and generate profits. As a result, regional blackouts and restrictions are implemented to encourage viewership through the authorized broadcaster within specific markets.

However, as someone who lives more than four hours away from my favorite MLB and NFL teams' stadiums, I am increasingly frustrated with the limitations imposed on my ability to watch games (blackouts). I'm consistently denied access to my favorite teams' games!!!

I recognize that streaming services have revolutionized how we consume sports, making it more accessible to fans worldwide. But at the same time, I can't help but feel that the existing restrictions hinder the potential of these platforms to provide a genuinely inclusive and seamless viewing experience for all sports enthusiasts, especially fans who won't drive 4+ hours to be forced to watch a game in person at the stadium.

It is essential to balance protecting broadcasters' rights and ensuring that *ALL* sports fans can access and enjoy their favorite teams' games, regardless of location. Perhaps it is time for them to reconsider the current blackout policies and work towards a more flexible model that can adapt to the changing landscape of sports broadcasting. And yes, ***Make it more affordable***!!!!

In the age of digital streaming and increasing globalization, it seems counterproductive to maintain rigid regional boundaries. Instead, they should explore innovative solutions to create a more inclusive and accessible sports viewing experience for all fans.

Comment What if the statement is correct, just incomplete? (Score 1) 103

This is just conjecture... but what if they left out a sentence intentionally?

"The article is misleading. We narrowly interpret every government request for user data to minimize disclosure. The mail scanning described in the article does not exist on our systems."

meant:

"The article is misleading. We narrowly interpret every government request for user data to minimize disclosure. The mail scanning described in the article does not exist on our systems. *COUGH* *COUGH* It DOES however run on systems provided by the NSA."

Censorship

How Amazon's Monster Erotica Book Ban Shaped CloudFlare's Censorship Stance (zdnet.com) 125

An anonymous reader writes with news that CloudFlare chief executive Matthew Prince recently spoke about how Amazon's ban on "monster erotica" helped shape his position on censorship. ZDNet reports: "I worry about Jeff Bezos' bizarre obsession with dinosaur sex," said Prince, towards the end of a long conversation in our New York newsroom. "I don't think I've ever heard a chief executive -- hell, I don't think I've ever heard anyone say anything like that before," I said. Prince was referring to how the bookseller and online retail giant banned so-called "monster erotica," a genre of fan-fiction revolving around fantasy-based fictional encounters with mythical or extinct creatures (including dinosaurs), which was for a time sold on its online bookstore. Amazon, according to reports, pulled hundreds of the self-published books it sold -- as well as some content that fetishized incest and rape -- despite "vague" guidelines by the retailer. "You can make a rational argument that if you're writing books fantasizing about having sex with animals or children, maybe that promotes a certain kind of behavior. But there's no risk of someone abusing a dinosaur," he said.

Slashdot Top Deals

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...