Comment Re:Hmmm... so? (Score 0) 72
Comment Re:"Not able to corroborate" (Score 0) 72
Comment Re:Not a singularity? (Score 0) 163
Comment Re:He should just plead insanity (Score 0) 56
Comment Re:Completely unsure (Score 0) 56
Comment Re: What is this crap doing here? (Score 0) 56
Comment Re: What is this crap doing here? (Score 0) 56
Comment Re: What is this crap doing here? (Score 0) 56
Comment Re: Future of space warfare (Score 0) 176
Comment Re:Here's my problem with it (Score 0) 141
Comment Re: "The decapitation of neo-conservatives" (Score 1) 116
Comment Re: Oh my God! They stole the manuscript (Score -1) 55
Comment Re: GPS can be jammed, so can this (Score 0) 99
Comment Re:Not on a traditional computer, it wont. (Score 1) 166
This lays out the argument pretty well: http://backreaction.blogspot.c...
"There are only two types of fundamental laws that appear in contemporary theories. One type is deterministic, which means that the past entirely predicts the future. There is no free will in such a fundamental law because there is no freedom. The other type of law we know appears in quantum mechanics and has an indeterministic component which is random. This randomness cannot be influenced by anything, and in particular it cannot be influenced by you, whatever you think “you” are. There is no free will in such a fundamental law because there is no “will” – there is just some randomness sprinkled over the determinism. "