Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Can't wait for the "NOOOO! Censorship!" crowd.. (Score 1) 898

I've outlined why I disagree with this multiple times. Not only was no physical damage done, but they need not be offended by anything this guy does. That is completely up to them.

I think you are looking at this the wrong way. Intent matters, it doesn't even matter if they took offense.

If I take a physical swing at someones chin and manage to miss it is still assault. If I attempt to shoot someone and miss it is assault.

I don't see how this as being much different. The guy takes an action with the intent to cause emotional harm.

I think most people can agree that attempt to cause harm is something that you can reasonably legislate against.

Comment Re:A Christian's take (Score 1) 1252

I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. I have approximate answers, and possible beliefs, and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything, and in many things I don't know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we're here, and what the question might mean. I might think about a little, but if I can't figure it out, then I go to something else. But I don't have to know an answer. I don't feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn't frighten me.
-- Richard Feynman (The Pleasure of Finding Things Out)

And, because you can't beat his delivery and the sparkle in his eyes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MmpUWEW6Is

The Media

Are Newspapers Doomed? 338

Ponca City, We love you writes "James Surowiecki has an interesting article in the New Yorker that crystalizes the problems facing print newspapers today and explains why we may soon be seeing more major newspapers filing for bankruptcy, as the Tribune Company did last week. 'There's no mystery as to the source of all the trouble: advertising revenue has dried up,' writes Surowiecki, but the 'peculiar fact about the current crisis is that even as big papers have become less profitable they've arguably become more popular,' with the blogosphere piggybacking on traditional journalism's content. Surowiecki imagines many possible futures for newspapers, from becoming foundation-run nonprofits to relying on reader donations to deep-pocketed patrons. 'For a while now, readers have had the best of both worlds: all the benefits of the old, high-profit regime — intensive reporting, experienced editors, and so on — and the low costs of the new one. But that situation can't last. Soon enough, we're going to start getting what we pay for, and we may find out just how little that is.'"

Slashdot Top Deals

If computers take over (which seems to be their natural tendency), it will serve us right. -- Alistair Cooke

Working...