Comment Re:post hoc ergo propter hoc (Score 1) 143
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur?
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur?
Except the sites that offer HTTPS are the highest traffic sites on the web: facebook, gmail, twitter.
You are dead wrong.
Except that you can't do an image search in HTTPS mode on google. So he may be a little bit more correct than you're giving him credit for...
Sounds like a pump and dump to me. Their stock is at approximately nothing, this claim has no actual details of process. It also violates common sense (complete combustion from a hydrocarbon? They're not zero impurity fuels)
Having RTFA, they actually claim no by-products - by which they mean no smoke. If (and this is a *big* if) the hydrocarbon was burning with 100% efficiency - no soot being produced - then surely the chemical reaction is maximising the amount of CO2 that the engine will then pump out; simple high-school chemistry says that there are byproducts of the combustion, they are just invisible to the human eye. The byproduct is also quite honestly the one that we don't want. Ecologically, from a global warming POV, having diesel *not* emit useless soot is absolutely catastrophic, as the carbon has to go somewhere. It's either soot, or carbon dioxide.
I still call bull on the claims, though...
1 Dog Pound = 16 oz. of Alpo