Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Re:Also missing... (Score 1) 120

And if X on Wayland works as well as XQuartz, it is just barely better than useless. When I run remote programs on XQuartz, it crashes a lot. Some programs can't reasonably be used at all, because XQuartz crashes so often (accidently hitting the mouse scroll wheel while in emacs seems to cause a crash every time). Real X on Linux has always worked beautifully in comparison. If X on Wayland is only as good as XQuartz, it is worth having in an emergency but no good for daily work. YMMV.

Comment All of the above (Score 1) 160

Well, yes, all of these to various extents. Plus the need at times to be precise, when the equivalent in general language is vague. Plus when writing for your peers, it is a lot easier to use your shared language.

Any particular impenetrable paper may result from one of these causes or any combination.

It is fair to say that if an informed layperson (someone with an ongoing interest in the field, not a specialized degree) cannot get the gist of the argument, then the paper is poorly written and shouldn't have been published.

Comment Re:If text is enough... (Score 1) 227

... then just use a simple text file. Come up with your own scheme for title, date and time and it will work. Either as single file with search, or with multiple files and grep(1).

And please make things easier on yourself by setting up commands to automate your own chosen format. I have simple commands for opening a file with today's date in the name, inserting date and time into the text of the file, generating numbered lines, and so on.

Autogenerating dates and times is particularly valuable in avoiding extremely costly mistakes.

(For me, this is aliasing "mylog" to something like emacs ~/Notes/`date +"%Y%m%d"`.txt)

Comment Re:kind of need them... (Score 1) 688

How can you point out that it is only MJG's work that lets Linux be more popular on new hardware than, oh, BeOS? That goes completely against the agreed-on narrative so ably established by previous posters, that Garrett is a useless whiner and who needs him. This is why it is so important to read everything before adding your own 2 cents.

Comment Re:Conflict of Interest (Score 1) 186

When they were called on their fraud, they checked their research and confirmed they did find an thermal anomaly as predicted by Pons and Fleischmann.

Oh, you've been listening to Eugene Mallove. (Just checked Wikipedia and heard for the first time of his terrible murder, so I will limit what I say.)

Scientific laboratories are complicated places. If the people who were there say, "There is a blip in the data when we changed the settings on the something-or-other" and someone who wasn't there says "This published plot PROVES cold fusion occurred" the default should not be to believe the person who wasn't there.

The experiment is not proof that there is no cold fusion. It is proof that cold fusion is not a robust, easily obtainable effect that could be reproduced based on the information publicly available at the time.

Comment Re:Hmmm .... (Score 1) 186

For example, it was shown almost TWENTY YEARS AGO in Jet that the capabilities of modern experiments outstripped their ability to deal with the effects of the resulting radiation, and no one has run a large experiment using a reactor-like fuel mix since.

Since then, there has been quite a bit of evidence collected that trying to design and construct a new machine with reactor-grade shielding on a shoestring budget is not something that can be accomplished quickly.

Comment Re:Work = Achieves Goals (Score 1) 337

No, the goal of every "reactor" ever built so far is to study plasma physics. To make the site ready for megawatts of flux of neutrons and gammas would cost five times as much and take 5 times as long to build. It's like testing water pumps and cooling towers for a fission plant without any uranium around--it's faster, cheaper, and safer. One device is under construction that WILL generate more power than it takes in, and the costs and building times are much higher in consequence.

Comment Re:Exactly (Score 2) 160

> its an issue of not even trying.

It's hard to disagree with this statement, although we do not know all the details. Compare to computers—we have insecure OS's running insecure servers on insecure networks, and then people realized that maybe all this should be retrofitted with security without losing a single capability or backwards compatibility. That's definitely hard. On the other hand, we have had cars secure from RF-based attacks for a hundred years, and now suddenly they become insecure without the addition of a single meaningful capability.

I could duck tape an ipad to the dash of my 10 year old car and have something more capable and more secure than a 1 year old car.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein