Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment PRK.. don't worry mon (Score 1) 550

So just to give the scoop on modern PRK for contrast, While many have mentioned, PRK is an older tech, it's not like it's static and stopped in time. Just like LASIK, it has improved over time and is a much different process than in the 90's. Early PRK systems imaged your eye for updates in the dozens or hundreds of times a second, the newer ones refresh thousands of times a second and are substantially more accurate, yadda yadda. I went and had all the various scans done, including the 3d imaging, and they determined that the only process they would recommend for me was PRK, and due to my cornea thickness they would not recommend LASIK. so I went ahead with it. I had PRK eye surgery in 2010. The experience was rather amazing, they laid me down on a table, put me in some headgear so I wouldn't move around, washed my eye with a variety of drops, and used some clamp to keep my eye open. then they said they were calibrating the machine again, some sounds happpened and it was under a minute, and then they said OK, time to do the other eye. I thought they meant they were going to prep my other eye, and the surgery was yet to come.... no... they had actually did all they needed to do in under a minute per eye. All told, I was out of the office in under 30 minutes, about 12 of those were signing forms. For me, even the clamps to hold my eyelid open weren't a huge burden, the only thing that actually annoyed the heck out of me is that they had a bright surgical lamp pointed at my face and I wasn't able to blink, which is a somewhat un-natural feeling. But to only have to do that for 10-15m, and have many years of amazing vision, I'd gladly do it again. and yes, the downside of PRK is that unlike lasik, you don't have 20/20 vision near immediately. Your eyes actually get worse as they heal, and then they get better after a week or two. I actually had PRK done right after finishing my exams at university, and remember a really weird time of when I was trying to do things everyday and I simply couldn't... I couldn't read a computer screen or book at any distance whatsoever for that first week, I was so afraid that maybe the doctor got it wrong, that I'd never be able to see anything properly again, and my entire career life would be ruined. I remember a really hellish day during that time, getting someone to drive me to university and needing to get some transcripts, and I more or less had to navigate the campus by memory and squinting at vague shapes... I had to take her word for it that she gave me my transcript and not someone else's. having worn glasses for nearly all my life, it was like someone had broken the only pair of glasses that would ever work for you, and there was no hope. ... and then it got better after a week or so. And after the initial healing process, I've lived the last 4 years with no side effects, not even dry eyes, no halos or night vision loss, and it's been a dream. Yes, at some point, I'll need reading glasses, but being able to have 20/20 vision for even some amount of time, and fixing my astigmatism, that's just amazing beyond belief. If you're in your 20's, and you have this option available to you, don't hesitate.
Censorship

Australian Judge Rules Simpsons Cartoon Rip-off Is Child Porn 612

An anonymous reader was one of several to note a bizarre story in which an Australian judge ruled that drawings can be child porn. In this case, it was knock off drawings of the Simpsons doing naughty things. Good thing they're going to be censoring the Down Undernet soon. Who knows what damage this could cause.
Windows

HP's Fury At Vista Capable Downgrade 499

More documents are coming out in court proceedings over the Vista Capable debacle. Internetnews.com has good coverage of HP's fury over Microsoft lowering the requirements for a Vista Capable sticker, at Intel's request. "Intel officials may have been pleased that Microsoft lowered standards for obtaining the company's Windows Vista Capable logo program sticker, but the same can't be said about HP's execs. 'I can't be more clear than to say you not only let us down by reneging on your commitment to stand behind the [device driver model] requirement, you have demonstrated a complete lack of commitment to HP as a strategic partner and cost us a lot of money in the process,' said one e-mail from Richard Walker, the senior vice president of HP's consumer business unit, to [Microsoft executives]." PCPro.co.uk follows the trail of accusatory emails inside Microsoft from there: "HP's email prompted then Microsoft co-President, Jim Allchin, to send a furious email of his own to company CEO Steve Ballmer. Allchin's email suggests the decision to lower the requirements was made in his absence by Ballmer, following 'a call between you and Paul [Otellini, Intel CEO].' 'I am beyond being upset here,' Allchin wrote to Ballmer. 'What a mess. Now we have an upset partner, Microsoft destroyed credibility [sic], as well as my own credibility shot.' Ballmer, in turn, blamed another Microsoft executive, Will Poole, in a rather erratically typed reply to Allchin."

Slashdot Top Deals

"This isn't brain surgery; it's just television." - David Letterman

Working...