Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:False dichotomy (Score 2) 57

That's not really where I was going with that. I'm merely contributing the point that the excessive use of energy with things like the energy used for nothing more then financial gain with regard to mining for profit is contributing to the over strain of the energy systems. That in addition to AI projects and other use cases. Things that don't necessarily provide a benefit to the most common folks day to day needs are not overly beneficial in the strictest sense. When common people are struggling to make ends meets at expense of those more fortunate being able to capitalize off their basic needs. Well a consideration has to be put forth as to how much benefit is this extra usage of resources. I would concede in a case by case bases that there are some benefits for sure to AI and alternative currencies, but... A point should have more been directed to all power hungry projects needing to recognize the strains and excessive costs associated with so called technological advancements requiring above average infrastructure needs and financial constrains to make those projects possible. There needs to be more contributions on the parts of currency mining projects and large data center driven AI projects to pay their way and help the system by taking on their fair share and more. To say AI projects alone are the main cost to spreading the resources thinly and needing to increase the cost to the consumer because of supply and demand constrains is not the whole picture. I get that the article referenced is concerning the most current point in energy usage today. The main point of the original article is excessive use of electricity at the expense of common folks. I merely added that crypto mining is part of the trouble as well.

Comment Crypto mining contributions. (Score 4, Interesting) 57

Lets not forget crypto mining. At least AI processing has some sort of intellectual benefit. I'm curious of the order of magnitude greater in which AI specific applications are using more energy compared to the total of crypto mining. That contribution can't be denied when putting the costs to the common folk for the excess infrastructure spending. Among many other things.

Comment Who would even. (Score 1) 151

Who would even click an ad in the settings that was not by accident? Or by trickery. That's stooping pretty low to try make money. Maybe some paid for IT assistance to help figure out what changes Mirco$shaft.Still... Sheesh.It rustles my jimmies. Is there no level to the corporate greed. How long before ad's that drop malware right from within windows itself happens. I'd suspect it's by design of course, naturally. Shameful really.

Comment Re:Ad spam. (Score 1) 61

Yes, that's what I worry about too.

The thing that was so refreshing with ChatGTP was that we could search for actual useful information and get results instead of having to sift through 4-5 pages of just AD search results.

Google is pretty much completely useless by now, but the money (for them) is too good for them to even care, but they did panic once they noticed that millions of users now started to use ChatGTP instead. Bing was for them no real threath as it was just a worse version than google.

The real problem starts when they eventually manipulate ChatGTP to make every ad sound like a wholesome recommendation almost like your friend is recommending something, and the ads write themselves, then we should worry, because you know you can't trust that, but it will be almost impossible for regular users to spot the difference between an "hidden ad" or real information.

So true. That's an interesting point. It's just a matter of time before the greed of profits takes over. It's inevitable. I appreciate it takes money to make things work. It's unfortunate that the forward direction will be only to make profits and less to provide a wholesome service. I'd actually also be willing to pay for a service like that as long as there was no manipulation. Even if Microsoft owned it. Even though that is debatable.

Comment Money for nothing. (Score 1) 145

Nothing like fixing a money problem by throwing more money at it. Can't have the US looking like it has a problem now. Not sure this really helps as much as it would seem on the surface. How much longer do they want the bull market to run. Another 10?. 20 years ? Forever? The fundamentals were still there before. Now everyone can say we had our drop in the markets. It should be nothing but the moon for the market now. (I hate that saying) Till the next issue comes around. I'm wagering on the wealthy holding all the chips and the poor uneducated keep perpetuating the stigma. In the future inflation will start increasing by droves and shelter will be unobtainable for an average individual. Or that is the ONLY thing you'll be able to afford. But you can have everything you want that debt provides. We need a mini mass extinction event. Or some super space science to blast us off this rock.

Comment Re:Much ado about nothing (Score 2) 117

I concur. Even if you use it once a week. It has benefits. It's like that polisher they use at the dentist when you are in for a cleaning. The cost is justified when you consider how much it is per cavity. It stands to reason that reviewing all available products and finding the best affordable unit is key. You don't need al the bells and whistles. In my personal experience. It is a noticeable marked improvement on everything. Even when you use it to massage the gums all around in ones mouth.

Slashdot Top Deals

If I set here and stare at nothing long enough, people might think I'm an engineer working on something. -- S.R. McElroy

Working...