Comment There are some things NASA can't explain. (Score 1) 507
note: I DO think we went to the moon, but there are some things NASA can't explain.
Namely, why in some pictures, the crosshairs which were on the camera lens itself, actually appear either partially or fully obstructed by objects in the pictures. In one picture, for example, one of the crosshairs appears behind an Astronaut, in another, behind a flag, etc. This is technically impossible, since the crosshairs were on the camera lens itself. Further more, numerous people, including former Astronauts have stated that it was impossible to take and bring back pictures, because of the Van Allen Radiation Belt, pointing out that numerous attempts were made prior to the moon landing to take pictures in space and bring them back, but each time the film was totally ruined, with spots and lines through it.
Again, I'm not saying we didn't go to the moon, we did, the physical evidence is irrefutable. But there's strong evidence to suggest that the picture were absolutely fake. It's not inconceivable that NASA realized that without pictures, many people wouldn't believe the landing took place, so they faked them.
Of course, NASA would never admit to that, because it would give more ammo to the "crackpots," and prompt many to wonder, if NASA was lying about that, what else are they lying about?
Just a thought.
Namely, why in some pictures, the crosshairs which were on the camera lens itself, actually appear either partially or fully obstructed by objects in the pictures. In one picture, for example, one of the crosshairs appears behind an Astronaut, in another, behind a flag, etc. This is technically impossible, since the crosshairs were on the camera lens itself. Further more, numerous people, including former Astronauts have stated that it was impossible to take and bring back pictures, because of the Van Allen Radiation Belt, pointing out that numerous attempts were made prior to the moon landing to take pictures in space and bring them back, but each time the film was totally ruined, with spots and lines through it.
Again, I'm not saying we didn't go to the moon, we did, the physical evidence is irrefutable. But there's strong evidence to suggest that the picture were absolutely fake. It's not inconceivable that NASA realized that without pictures, many people wouldn't believe the landing took place, so they faked them.
Of course, NASA would never admit to that, because it would give more ammo to the "crackpots," and prompt many to wonder, if NASA was lying about that, what else are they lying about?
Just a thought.
