Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not exactly. (Score 1) 189

That's not how I read your comment.

Agreed, it's important to keep relevant, and to learn new languages, technologies, etc. Many of the new tools, just re-invent old solutions with incremental improvements. For most businesses, it's just not worth the cost to jump to something new. Also, the risk-adverse nature of high availability environments dictates an attitude of measured and careful change.

Your clarification on staying relevant makes your initial statement clearer.

In the end, most of us will be working with technology long out of date, because it pays, and occasionally with technology that is new, because we want too.

Comment Re:Meanwhile (Score 1) 189

Average developers will continue using Java as forward-thinking engineers use Scala, JavaScript, and other progressive languages to solve real problems faster.

Employed developers will continue to use Java, COBOL, Pascal, or whatever their employer's code-base is written in. This seldom has anything to do with the skill of the developer, and almost everything to do with the cost of converting functional, stable code to a new language. The case to move to a new language must include benefits in excess of the stability of the existing code-base.

Average developers will make a mess of any code-base, regardless of the "new hotness" status of the language.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any programming language is at its best before it is implemented and used.

Working...