Comment Re:Sure about the Louvre? (Score 2) 183
Comment Freudian read (Score 1) 48
Comment Re:Grammar (Score 1) 329
Please proof read proof read!
"you may have noticed that many of them won't play won't play."
Oh, I thought that was just Eddie The Echo
Comment Re:Hmmm... (Score 1) 983
Comment Re:Nice effort, but sets a bad precedent (Score 1) 95
The problem is, by third parties paying him, it sets a precedent for rewarding Facebook's bad behavior.
Nah. Now everybody knows that instead of getting $500 from Facebook telling them about their bugs, they can get $12k from the community by just hacking them directly.
Comment Re:Robbing Peter to Pay Paul (Score 4, Funny) 120
Robbing Peter to Pay Paul
yikes! What about poor Mary? She gets nothing?
Comment Re:So let's see... (Score 1) 70
We've got the Van Allen belt... what are the other two, Van Morrison and Van Johnson?
Let's hope it stays at three so we don't get a Van Damme belt as well.
Comment Re:Honestly? (Score 1) 220
Comment Re:"JUST" 12 light years? LOL. (Score 5, Funny) 420
Could you get more by slingshotting around the sun?
Yeah, but you'll end up in San Francisco in 1986 so it won't do you any good.
Comment Re:Caffine (Score 5, Funny) 878
was anybody talking to you, faggot? if you value your health, you better shut the fuck up too.
Dude, decaf.
Comment Fucking magnets. (Score 1) 383
Comment Re:Archer (Score 1) 238
Neelix is the Jar Jar Binks of Star Trek.
Now where's that "+1 so true" mod when you need it?
Comment Re:Once again (Score 4, Insightful) 43
And the government should never take money from people to pay for something they're religiously opposed to.
NOTE: I'm not arguing with parent, I'm saying that both his statement and mine are how it should be.
So no tax can fund school where girls attend for a Taliban?