The examples they cite are reasonable, I think (Score 2, Interesting)

There *are* uses of surveillance that I think cross the line. However the examples mentioned in the article are, I think, quite reasonable. If we do use the technology we have *within reasonable limits* - thats good. However, we also need a new national dialogue on preventing a surveillance society that ignores reasonable limits as well.

But, lets face it, nobody wants to see real terrorism occur, either, when we could have been doing something..but weren't.

Its a slippery slope..