Comment No mo(o)re Turing... (Score 1) 33
It's not Moore going down the drain, it's Turing.
Quantum computers are different, but that doesn't mean they can compute 1+1 faster (read the last paragraph of the article where they claimed to need _longer_ dephasing times?)
Chip manufacturers still have normal optical chips to go, which are significantly faster than conventional chips.
Why do you combine computational quantum power with intelligence? It's intriguing to take that into our own heads, where so many quantum states are available (exceeding the chemical states and processes by far).
Quantum computers are different, but that doesn't mean they can compute 1+1 faster (read the last paragraph of the article where they claimed to need _longer_ dephasing times?)
Chip manufacturers still have normal optical chips to go, which are significantly faster than conventional chips.
Why do you combine computational quantum power with intelligence? It's intriguing to take that into our own heads, where so many quantum states are available (exceeding the chemical states and processes by far).
