The interesting thing was that Google dumped some of the AI talent they accumulated
The first obligation of M&A is to eliminate redundant staff, and that includes 'talent'.
Because YT is primarily a content delivery service with far less R&D involved in its day to day operations?
The writing was on the wall when Apple introduced Time Machine for the average user, but Retrospect was an excellent utility for people who might have had more than one type of backup set for their Macs. Here's to hoping it finds a new home.
What a bitter, reductionist approach to describing the field.
It is also entirely correct.
I'm super glad you're paying to read Bloomberg, NYT etc. but this is marketing if you only link paywalled sites.
Except... it's been running since 2010.
The important thing is that without doing any research, you formed an opinion then asked us to validate or refute it. Good job!
Don't be ridiculous. There's no such thing.
The use of a nonce to prevent record/replay attacks was not new in 2011, it had already been a practice for preventing Flash streaming media playback from being spoofed by that point and I doubt Adobe were the first to think of it. The PTO were idiots to grant that patent but they're clear that they don't take responsibility for establishing novelty. To be blunt, most of the IP patents related to the Web between 2000–2015 are questionable at best; the Microsoft Word XML patent splitting raw text from formatting has direct prior art in Nisus Writer (which used plain ASCII text files, storing formatting in the files' resource forks; its former developers refused to comment on all requests regarding this) and many of the rest are submarine patents from noncoders.
And the year of the Spoony
Tell me your lawyers told you to post this without telling me your lawyers told you to post this
"Plastic gun. Ingenious. More coffee, please." -- The Phantom comics
