"Building Great Software Engineering Teams: Recruiting, Hiring, and Managing Your Team from Startup to Success", by Joshua Tyler; Apress 2015 (ISBN: 9781484211342) "Harnessing the UEFI Shell: Moving the Platform Beyond DOS", 2nd Ed., by Michael Rothman, Vincent Zimmer, & Tim Lewis; De Gruyter 2017 (ISBN: 9781501514807) "Beginning C++17: From Novice to Professional", 5th Ed., by Ivor Horton & Peter Van Weert; Apress 2018 (ISBN: 9781484233658) "Real-Time C++: Efficient Object-Oriented and Template Microcontroller Programming", 2nd Ed., by Christopher Kormanyos; Springer 2015 (ISBN: 9783662478097)

That would be the very definition of infringement. You're not attacking the right itself, you're just trying to nibble away at the fringes. It's like saying, you have the right to speak your mind, but you don't have the right to express distrust or criticism of the government. If you do that, the government will punish you. You have the right to keep and bear arms, but not arms that satisfy this list of cosmetic effects. If you keep or bear any of THOSE arms, the government will punish you. Same thing. Just keep and bear OTHER arms, ones the state approves of, and just express OTHER ideas from your mind, ones the state approves of.

Just one more step after Youtube, blogs, and Twitter to Neil Stephenson's gargoyles from Snow Crash.