Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Google

Google To Challenge Facebook Again 197

Hugh Pickens writes "Google is set to make a fresh attempt to gain a foothold in the booming social networking business, seeking to counter the growing threat that Facebook poses to some of its core services. USA Today reports that the search giant is upgrading Gmail to add social-media tools similar to those found on Facebook, including photo and video sharing within the Gmail application, along with a new tool for status updates. According to reports, Google is planning to give Gmail users a way to aggregate the updates of their various contacts on the service, creating a stream of notifications that would echo the similar real-time streams from Facebook and Twitter. Google's decision to exploit the heavily-used Gmail service as the basis for its latest assault on the social networking business partly reflects the failure of Google's previous stand-alone efforts to enter the social networking sector. Its Orkut networking service, though launched before Facebook, has failed to gain a mass following in most parts of the world, despite success in Brazil, and its acquisition of Twitter rival Jaiku ended in failure after it scrapped development of the service." Update: 02/09 19:32 GMT by KD : It's been announced as Google Buzz; CNET has a detailed writeup.

Comment Separate the apps, not the data. (Score 1) 167

Having different applications for different types of data usually make sense, if only to limit the amount of options presented to the user so they can make an intelligent decision about what action they want to perform.

I agree wholeheartedly that unifying desktop applications into one nebulous interface isn't a very useful way to give users access to their data. Mail clients make good mail clients, but they make lousy photo gallery browsers.

That said, what I do wish we'd see more of is an effort for different applications to share the same information, because the dividing line between which application to use is much clearer than the dividing line between which application should be the keeper of particular types of data.

I don't want to have to open my web browser to see if I've bookmarked a URI that somebody mentioned in an IRC channel. I also don't want to have to open my PIM to find the phone number of somebody who I'm talking to in that IRC channel.

These are the sorts of data access issues I'd like to see resolved, and I do see RDF as a possible, even attractive, approach to solving the problem. However, as you've pointed out, we can't simply modify our applications to all spit out RDF, and expect everything to fall into place. Some degree of consensus about how to represent data is required. Rather than writing new applications like Haystack, or looking for new approaches to managing one's information, I'd rather see efforts to modify existing applications to share data sources more effectively.

Slashdot Top Deals

If I set here and stare at nothing long enough, people might think I'm an engineer working on something. -- S.R. McElroy

Working...