when people mention reasons why they don't believe it, or ask real questions about it seeking clearer understanding, all we get is attacked, demeaned and insulted.
But you didn't ask any questions. Your post said
I was 100% on board with global warming until the email leaks
How insightful. What kind of a response do you expect if you haven't even looked into the CRU hacking case?
Now, the two important things we did learn from the CRU emails are that 1) denialists bombard the scientists with information requests, which is a drain on their resources and 2) there wasn't anything weird going on at CRU.
So, can you tell us why these facts made you doubt the existence of AGW?